Jewish take
Isn’t it in the Bible? Like, very clearly written?
When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Matthew 27:24
Fucking mong
So if I kill a guy, or order his death, then wash my hands and declare that I'm not guilty, I'm absolved of the guilt for what I had done?
Good to know.
What I would say is that both the romans who had physically done the deed, and the jews who had commanded that the deed be done, would both be guilty of the death of Christ, and whatever they say or do has nothing to do with how guilty they are for their role in his death.
But that's just me, being sane.
What’s this mean? That one person wasn’t involved or refused to be named in the involvement?
Found the kike
All I’m saying is, isn’t it the Romans who get credit for driving the nails, raising the cross, and spearing his side? Am I missing something here?
Besides, Jesus was destined to die for the sins of mankind. It was going to happen and it was supposed to. If theJews killed him then they literally did the goyim a favor. I’d rather have the Romans do it.
It's clearly written and recorded that it was the jews decision and that Pilate washed his hands of it.
Also written and recorded that Jesus was a kike who considered himself king of all kikes, the kikes wrote the bible, kikes led Christianity through its beginnings and even to this day.
It was the elite Jewish Sanhedrin and their rent-a-mob who howled to crucify Jesus. Pilate was a coward who caved into the mob.
Stop being argumentative about a subject you clearly have little knowledge.
How do you know he has little knowledge, eh, eh? Can I have a citation from a reputable source for this claim?
I just love getting trad cucks riled up about clearly known facts concerning their cucked faith. It’s always entertaining seeing all the revisionism they believe to avoid the cognitive dissonance of simultaneously hating Jews and worshiping a Jewish demigod.
Which version, from which publishing house, from which century ?
Ever play the game "telephone" ? Now do it over 1400 years, across 7 continents , and through publishers who have destroyed countless books that they found "offensive'.
If you read the bible as anything more than a social guide for "a more moralist society...with child brides and prostitution being perfectly fine"...I mean if you're trying to use it as a fucking historical document....then there's no hope for your brain. It's likely suffering from intelligence deficiencies already.
Then why do you people worship satan. If belief in the divine is insane, so is the belief in the occult, by your logic. All jew secret societies are basically day-care centers for retards. Dangerous retards.
The problem with the Bible is ChristCuchs teach as simple to understand. Unless one studies it in context of ancient history of the region, human migratory patterns and along with the other "books" left out of it...it bears little fruit in real understanding. Secondly, churches teach the easy parts easy for slumbering goyim and skip the "Synagogue of Satan" testimony. We were taught in the Methodist tradition to honor the Catholic Church and forgive the jews because they didn't know he was God. Complete bullshit if you pardon the expression. God will spew them out as tepid. I have nothing more to do with false teachers.
(post is archived)