Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

667

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (86).
[–] • 9 pts

When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.

Matthew 27:24

Fucking mong

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

So if I kill a guy, or order his death, then wash my hands and declare that I'm not guilty, I'm absolved of the guilt for what I had done?

Good to know.

What I would say is that both the romans who had physically done the deed, and the jews who had commanded that the deed be done, would both be guilty of the death of Christ, and whatever they say or do has nothing to do with how guilty they are for their role in his death.

But that's just me, being sane.

[–] • 2 pts

There may be some culpability, but this isn’t a 50:50 share of the blame. Try 90:10 with the Jews to blame.

[–] • -1 pt

What’s this mean? That one person wasn’t involved or refused to be named in the involvement?

[–] • 3 pts

If he didn't kill Jesus the crowd of kikes would cause a riot leading to more death and destruction.

[–] • 0 pt

Death and destruction of who and what? The Romans and Rome? Lol.