People don't seem to understand that the best thing for young women is being married off early. Whether or not 15 is too young is another debate and I can certainly entertain both sides, but, ultimately, convincing young women to not have kids when they're at their most fertile is a vile thing to do. It's just about as vile as convincing them, instead of being mothers, to not have kids until they're in their thirties or forties and to instead shit up the job market and therefore the infrastructure and economy of our country.
Feminism has a price, a hefty one. Maybe birth control offered us the genius of women after all, but I'm not certain the price was really worth it. Feminized men, a lock of homogeneity a welfare and police state and porous borders (harming even more young girls because of trafficking) may as well be a death knell. Recovering from this will be very, very difficult. I, for one, do not think the genius of women was worth all of this. So, just like it's best for young men to be taught a trade because not all of them are cut out for Law, Medicine or Engineering, it's an evil thing to do to convince young women that they have much to offer society beyond caring for it, which, to me, is already a great task (and incredibly important).
100 percent correct. Now teach young men the value of a stay-at-home woman. Women will always kill themselves with "liberation" without a strong patriarchy.
(post is archived)