WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

598

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

So the better option is have the 15 yo go ride the cock carousel, use up her sexual value, get a bs “career” where’s she married to her job instead, then end up childless drinking boxed wine, popping antidepressants and then dying alone found only after her cats eat half her face off?

I think these girls know more than the OP faggot does.

[–] 2 pts

Once a girl has met her aunt flo, she's at an age to consider ready. That doesn't mean that she's mentally prepared, but that's the job of the mother. I see nothing wrong with a 15 year old getting married. We've been conditioned to consider people children until they are 24, and that's unfortunate.

[–] 2 pts

Children until 24? Try 40. Most millennial hipster couples are still attached to their parents apron strings as they themselves pass grandparent age.

[–] 1 pt

People don't seem to understand that the best thing for young women is being married off early. Whether or not 15 is too young is another debate and I can certainly entertain both sides, but, ultimately, convincing young women to not have kids when they're at their most fertile is a vile thing to do. It's just about as vile as convincing them, instead of being mothers, to not have kids until they're in their thirties or forties and to instead shit up the job market and therefore the infrastructure and economy of our country.

Feminism has a price, a hefty one. Maybe birth control offered us the genius of women after all, but I'm not certain the price was really worth it. Feminized men, a lock of homogeneity a welfare and police state and porous borders (harming even more young girls because of trafficking) may as well be a death knell. Recovering from this will be very, very difficult. I, for one, do not think the genius of women was worth all of this. So, just like it's best for young men to be taught a trade because not all of them are cut out for Law, Medicine or Engineering, it's an evil thing to do to convince young women that they have much to offer society beyond caring for it, which, to me, is already a great task (and incredibly important).

[–] 0 pt

100 percent correct. Now teach young men the value of a stay-at-home woman. Women will always kill themselves with "liberation" without a strong patriarchy.

[–] 0 pt

They do if they have social media accounts.

[–] 2 pts

Notice how this conflates pedophilia (legal 9yo) with conservative values (be good wife/mother and take care of children, husband and house).

[–] 3 pts

it is a projection. a (((leftist))) would just use the girl and be done with her. They don't understand that pair-bonding is a very real thing, and it means that a person's (especially female's) first love is their permanent partner. Do I think that this means 9 is a good age? or 15? or 17? no, it doesn't; but "first loves" happen at some age.

I think it is best to stick to the social norms of the west where 18 is the age, but we need to teach our children the truth about relationships.

[–] 1 pt

My husband's mother was 14 when she married her 24yr husband. They were married over 40 years until his death. She never remarried.

I know of many long term marrieds with similar numbers - the idea that a woman can only be fulfilled by being a stranger's wage slave is sociopathic.

A little girl is so brainwashed she thinks her purpose in life is to get married and to get pregnant and be a perfect housewife.

So what is their purpose in life?

[–] 1 pt

Cum receptacle and wage slave are the true paths to happiness, just ask any 300lb blue haired landwhale.

[–] 1 pt

From Gonzales, TX historical monument plaque. Different times, different customs.

Sarah Ponton Eggleston. Born Sept 1820, married May 1835. Aged 14.

"Sarah had lovely dark eyes and classical features that portrayed a wholesome beauty. On May 3, 1835 she married thirty-five year old Horace Eggleston."

https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=158403

[–] 1 pt

Show tits or it didn't happen.

[–] 1 pt

In reading the comments this is happening in Iraqistan so it's perfectly normal for sandniggers to intermarry their children to it's cousins. The entire sandbox is more inbred than Alabama

[–] 3 pts

I would guess Alabama was never a bunch of incestual idiots, more kike programming that conservative people are inbred retards. Clearly the smart thing to do is flood our country with niggers, destroy our manufacturing and outsource everything to China. Fuck you and go back to reddit

[–] 1 pt

I would guess Alabama was never a bunch of incestual idiots, more kike programming that conservative people are inbred retards.

You are correct. On average, ozark hillbillies have an above average white IQ. Which makes sense as without such intelligence you can't remain independent and self sufficient in such environmental conditions.

Notice how they frequently conflate lack of education as low intellect. Frequently for comedic value.

[–] 1 pt

And yet so many white people are so quick to throw their own brothers under the bus. It may be a joke, but I will not allow it. If there's one group we should insult it's everyone else

[–] 0 pt

Fuck you. No there is a town in AL where everyone is related with a lot of genetic defects.

[–] 0 pt

Well fuck you again, i wont allow kike propaganda to tear down our brothers in the South

[–] 0 pt

The Middle East is in early stage brainwashing for social self destruction - like where we were 150 years ago.

By the way, the US South is less inbred than the northeast, where some families have had 400 years of urban intermingling. I suggest using "the entire sandbox is more inbred than Connecticut Yankees" for some real sister/brother intermingling, "the Amish".