Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

:)

:)

(post is archived)

[–] • 11 pts

ban echo chambers

NPC doesn't realize Rettardit is 99.997% echo chambers for (((progressive))) (((degeneracy))) and (((agendas))). I agree, let's ban Rettardit.

[–] • 1 pt

Holy hell no don't ban it, where do you think all those fags will infect next?

[–] • 3 pts

Can we also ban islam subs because there be taliban?

[–] • 2 pts

Can all jewish related subs be banned as well for their war crimes against innocent civilians and mass murder of children in the Middle East and Palestine?

[–] • 3 pts

Or you know, the Holodomor.

[–] • 0 pt

And anything Christian themed since that's Judaism 2.0 and had done more harm to the European people than anything else.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

False. Christianity is the very antithesis of Judaism. Either you don’t know their definitions or you’re speaking in hyperbole. The above was your response to Holodomor? Think that through brother. I believe in you.

[–] • 3 pts

It's real; https://old reddit com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/p488k0/reddit_please_ban_incel_subreddits/h8xnaqh/?context=3

=

https://archive.md/XrnNC

[–] • 2 pts

Reddit has a huge female incel sub.

Im guessing that they are excluded

[–] • 1 pt

yeah that would be sexist...

[–] • 1 pt

whats with all those faggy flairs? i literally havent been to that aids pit since like 2015

[–] • 2 pts

People pay to give posters some etoken. As far as I understand it. Like. Real money.

[–] • 1 pt

so a bunch of literal cuckolds. got it

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah. It confuses me too. Especially with how much they all complain about being poor.

[–] • 1 pt

But I thought guns were banned in brit-bongistan?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Based off of this, all communist/socialist and pro China subs should be banned for their terrible crimes against humanity as Chairman Mao had more people killed than Stalin and Hitler combined.

Even Tiananmen Square alone is grounds to ban all pro communist and China users and subs based off of this logic.

[–] • 0 pt

Hitler had 0 people killed.

[–] • 0 pt

When Reinhard Heydrich was assassinated he ordered the razing of the entire village it happened in and had everyone killed for revenge.

Not to mention the Night of Long Knives, or the people involved in the 7/20 plot.

But yeah, in the greater scope, since there was no Holo-Cost yeah he killed many less than Stalin.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh. Was figuring you mean German men. The Night of Long Knives were commies so no loss. The village was a Czech village and Czech is who were given the middle third of Germany that the (((treaty of Versailles))) gave as Germany's punishment for (((WW1))). So I understand Hitler's animosity toward them as they were raping, torturing, and murdering German citizens after the (((treaty))) before (((WW2))).

But I suppose that would be Hitler having them killed.

[–] • 0 pt

I agree; for how many eons have these homely fuckers been slaughtering people as a result of their commiseration? We can't let these people talk about their problems lest they solve their own issues or force society to confront its flaws. /s

One Psychotic jew mutt does a drive by on a sorority because they wont fuck him and suddenly it's somehow a moral imperative to prevent. An intelligent society would be studying the phenomena not trying to sweep it under the rug.