![CrappyRedditGuy [960x512 - 393KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/dIBAk1.png){kind=link}
“Her?”
“Her?”
I was just gonna point out the same thing. This guy's a faggot (not you OP)
I was just gonna point out the same thing. This guy's a faggot (not you OP)
The “artist” must be one of those left-leaning centrists. They’re incapable of understanding that once we started tolerating gays, it was only a matter of time before pedophiles pushed for the right to molest children. And since society fell for the gay agenda, of course it fell for the tranny agenda, which is yet another part of the plan to argue that children can give consent. “If a child can consent to cutting his dick off, he can consent to anything!”
You could explain this to them until you’re blue in the face, and they’d just call you out on making a slippery slope a fallacy.
Is it truly a fallacy if reality proves us right yet again?
The “artist” must be one of those left-leaning centrists. They’re incapable of understanding that once we started tolerating gays, it was only a matter of time before pedophiles pushed for the right to molest children. And since society fell for the gay agenda, of course it fell for the tranny agenda, which is yet another part of the plan to argue that children can give consent. “If a child can consent to cutting his dick off, he can consent to anything!”
You could explain this to them until you’re blue in the face, and they’d just call you out on making a slippery slope a fallacy.
Is it truly a fallacy if reality proves us right yet again?
(post is archived)