WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

799

Who is he kidding? And how about he actually refutes their arguments rather than wishing them to get censored?

Post mentions ADL, uses the word nazis, etc.

The Right practically dominates YouTube, is spread throrough many different groups including Alt-Right ones, has a significant QAnon presence that was reduced in the October purges (Thankfully), dominates because of more simple and populist rhetoric, it is not easy to deradicalize people who fall prey to this rhetoric and the only sane solution is deplatforming those who are on the far-Right.

Because he can not refute arguments, he calls for deplatforming.

Who is he kidding? And how about he actually refutes their arguments rather than wishing them to get censored? Post mentions ADL, uses the word *nazis*, etc. > The Right practically dominates YouTube, is spread throrough many different groups including Alt-Right ones, has a significant QAnon presence that was reduced in the October purges (Thankfully), dominates because of more simple and populist rhetoric, it is not easy to deradicalize people who fall prey to this rhetoric and the only sane solution is deplatforming those who are on the far-Right. Because he can not refute arguments, he calls for deplatforming.

(post is archived)

I think the whole goal of posts like these are to shift the Overton Window. By making the most outrageous, extreme claims to the left, you make even the most slightly insane things look sane. My gut-instant strategic reaction is to try to make posts claiming the most extreme antithetical statement to counter posts like this. Stuff like, "There are NO alt-right videos anywhere on the internet anymore". Yes, it's obviously false, but so are posts like this, so if they want to play that game, it's only fair.

[–] 1 pt

Overton Window

Thank you for mentioning it!

[–] 1 pt

That damn lock picking lawyer, of course he’s a Nazi

[–] 1 pt

Wanting to send niggers to wakanda where they will be free of white oppression and can prosper like the kings they are somehow is hate speech.

[–] 1 pt

Don't accept their labels of the far-right, alt-right or the right - that's not who we are.

I'm going to refer to us as the true-right from now because that's the only accurate description of what we bring to the conversation.

[–] 0 pt

Honestly that's no better. The problem with any of the labels is that no one really agrees on the taxonomy of political views. Not saying I don't use labels like left, right, progressive, liberal, conservative, etc, but they are only really meaningful directionally and in a given context as the relate to each other.