WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

461

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] 4 pts

That's a remnant of subs a degenerate kike shill created years ago and I forgot to disable it when the account got banned.

Fixed now. Sub disabled.

[–] 2 pts

Creator should be properly banned or blue-jewed.

[–] 1 pt

" Creator should be properly banned or blue-jewed.

He (or she) was banned from Poal, although I don't know if it was because of that sub.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

The sub of the day isn't selected by a human.

It's a random dice roll. I don't believe AOU has taken the time to personally curate every single sub to remove "bad subs" from the list of choices.

Edit: I am sure he would gladly welcome your doing so. Shoot him a PM with the full list if/when you've finished reviewing them all.

[–] 3 pts

The sub of the day isn't selected by a human.

It's a random dice roll. I don't believe AOU has taken the time to personally curate every single sub to remove "bad subs" from the list of choices.

I know and understand that. I'm not asking @AOU to curate every sub on the site. I'm wondering aloud how a sub about incest made it here, and what is to be done about it. If it doesn't violate the TOS, then there's nothing to do.

[–] 3 pts

I don't believe it violates TOS.

It's not illegal content. Just jewish and distasteful.

[–] 3 pts

It's not illegal content. Just jewish and distasteful.

Then there's nothing to do but ignore it.

[–] 1 pt

Promotion of obscenity is illegal. But (((SCOTUS))).

That's right goyim. Ignore but you know you will look every so often. The jews will be there for your cravings.

[–] 1 pt

Could we perhaps get a comment section for subs (not threads in subs) so we can all leave a comment on what we think of filth like that? It would be a good way to naturally reject things without outright banning

[–] 1 pt

Could we perhaps get a comment section for subs (not threads in subs) so we can all leave a comment on what we think of filth like that? It would be a good way to naturally reject things without outright banning

That might be doable in the default subs, but asking for it in every single one would be a mess. I can't imagine anyone wanting to spend the time answering comments about their subs. I sure as hell wouldn't.

[–] 1 pt

Maybe just a comment only, no reply. Something stuck on the side. Would allow people to condemn and have their say without calling for removal

[–] 2 pts

Would allow people to condemn and have their say without calling for removal

The Tar and Feather section!

[–] 1 pt

Sick motherfuckers

[–] 0 pt

Do you remember /b/ random? Yeah, sometimes randomness leads to some interesting content.

[–] 6 pts

Yeah, sometimes randomness leads to some interesting content.

It sometimes does. I don't think incest falls into that category, however.

[–] 0 pt

"interesting" I see where your interests are

[–] 0 pt

That's engrishishards

That's engrishishards

Makes sense. He's clearly inbred and a sister fucker.

[–] -1 pt

Oh, he's Canadian?

[–] -1 pt

FRENCH Canadian

[–] 0 pt

The incest sub was created by an unrelated account that has been banned long ago. Read the sticky comment.

[–] 0 pt

One of crenschs then, got it!

[–] 0 pt

The RNG is a troll.

[–] -1 pt

sweet home alabama

[–] 1 pt

israel* Anti-White kike.

[–] -1 pt

it was just a joke calm your tits