WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

766

The article accuses Torba of allowing threats of violence, Which real threats of violence are allowed on Gab? It accuses Torba of allowing doxing. Who is allowed to dox whom? The article complains that there are extremists on Gab, which is a direct consequence of Gab being a free speech platform. All in all, the article is the usual whining that Gab doesn't censor enough.

> The article accuses Torba of allowing threats of violence, Which real threats of violence are allowed on Gab? It accuses Torba of allowing doxing. Who is allowed to dox whom? The article complains that there are extremists on Gab, which is a direct consequence of Gab being a free speech platform. All in all, the article is the usual whining that Gab doesn't censor enough.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts 2y

...An article about a faggot glownigger written by a faggot SJW...

Torba is a faggot glownigger. It's been proven time and time again. Gab is the biggest honeypot on the internet. And just like the author pointed out Torba is more than happy to report his users to the FBI. Real stand up guy. But let's ignore that because we can say nigger on Gab... Pfffft

The author of the article is a fucking faggot too. Non stop whining throughout the entire fucking article. And truth wasn't good enough for him he also had to throw in some unsubstantiated rumors as well...

[–] 2 pts 2y

Torba has previously asked people to report glownigger posts and to not engage with accounts encouraging glownigger topics.

As expected, the glownigger use their own posts to claim gab is dangerous. All they confirm is glowniggers are extremely dangerous (see treasonous j6 glowniggers as proof).

[–] 1 pt 2y

100%. these leftists are the kings of creating circular logic. they understand the tactic well and know the vast majority are too retarded to dive into the original claim or grasp the larger picture that someone who wants to manipulate you would go to these kinds of lengths.

[–] 2 pts 2y

Why hasn’t the SEC done anything about it?

GAB isn't publicly traded. Why would the SEC do anything? If Torba were involved in financial crimes it would be the FBI to investigate.

The rest of the article are just gabs taken out of context. Whoever wrote this lacks basic 8th grade research skills.

[–] 1 pt 2y (edited 2y)

c

Christian

Suspect as fuck, but presents good evidence.

In January of 2017, a list of Gab’s verified users and donors was datamined and released to the public17. Torba responded to this incident with a Gab post claiming that the “SJW goons” did not hack Gab as the data was apparently public and further claimed that security was Gab’s top priority18.

That's not hacking, It's not wrong to say that's not hacking, because it isn't. Gathering public data is something done and people are, for some reason, scared of. This point is bad but a lot of the rest are very telling.

(((mastodon))) kvetching about muh 'w' White Supremacy

This is article is a distraction, it's (((D&C))), what it says may be mostly true but it's intentions are not. A lot of this post is concerning and mostly truthful. There's quite a bit to question though. This appears like a (((mastodon))) hit piece. The clues aren't obvious but it starts with the spamming of (((lolicon))) and (((porn))) in general on gab. This is a well known method kikes use to deplatform things. And they succeeded here. They also admitted and bragged about this being a course of action they were going to use / were taking on gab. They did the exact same thing with twitter when musk took over. Because twitter is jewish owned, because gab may be (I'm still open but unconvinced) jewish owned does not in any way mean it won't be taken down / attacked with methods of jewish subversion.

This all while ignoring the established fact that (((mastodon))) has instances full of (((illegal content))) that the jew dev doesn't care about. Say one single thing about jews and your (((mastodon))) instance is attacked.

↓ expand content
[–] 0 pt 2y

And we should care, why?