WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Can't be a second exclamation point; then it would equal 668950291344912705758811805409037258675274633313802981029567135230163355724496298936687416527198498130815763.

[–] 1 pt

No, it wouldn't. The exclamation point is either a math operator OR a grammatical marker. It is not both.