Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I didn't bother reading the article but here it is.

https://archive.ph/tGzn1

[X link](https://x.com/TheEconomist/status/1986831038576841202) I didn't bother reading the article but here it is. https://archive.ph/tGzn1
[–] • 6 pts

The author

!

[–] • 5 pts

One does not need to go to Wikipedia to know what "his" early life will say.

[–] • 5 pts

Correct. It is what everyone expects.

[–] • 3 pts

Looks like he craves cocks.

[–] • 2 pts

I'm surprised he was able to take the cock out of his ass long enough for the picture.

[–] • 2 pts

Going for the whistler's faggot look.

[–] • 4 pts

So have more white babies is the impression I'm getting.

[–] • 2 pts

How insidious of you.

[–] • 2 pts

THANKS FOR NOTICING!

[–] • 2 pts

Quiet! My white babies are sleeping!!

[–] • 4 pts

Surprise, the author is an ashkenazi jew faggot who lives in china. Isn't it an odd cohencidence that he gets to write about killing off all the White races in the (((economist)))?

[–] • 3 pts

You don’t hate kikes as much as they deserve.

[–] • 2 pts

I'm hating them as hard as I can!

[–] • 1 pt

lol The (((article))) is (((paywalled))).

That meana that the only point to writing this was:

(a) to antagonize White People, and (b) count how many people click through based on the pro-White comments on the X post (by adding a link tracker to the URL in X post), and (c) to try to entice some dumb nigger to (((pay))) for article access.

This is the cleverest level of thinking that kikes can muster. Intellectually, jews literally can do no better than this.

And because of their noahide ethics, this is therefore the best they can do ethically as well.

Nobody hates these child-raping motherfuckers enough.

[–] • 1 pt