Correct. War.
Correct. War.
“Only certain people get criminal mulligans and Jan. 6 protestors, they don’t get criminal mulligans and here’s why. They’re the oppressor. So the oppressed get criminal mulligans. The people who are complaining, like us, we’re actually oppressors and we’re losing power so that’s why we are upset. I just got a job at MSNBC. So let’s compare the rights between criminals and victims, ok? Criminals get a mulligan, they can steal up to $900 worth of stuff, they can loiter, sleep, and shoot up in public areas including playgrounds, they can loot and burn and call it social justice. They can pile up dozens of arrests and never do time. Meanwhile, what about us? Well we have to change our lives to accommodate risk wherever we go. We have to move out of cities for the sake of the safety of our families and our own safety. That’s what’s happening. We are being driven out of cities by the oppressed, so I return to my imperfect analogy from yesterday. We had a war over slavery. We knew slavery was inhumane and immoral, but somehow we couldn’t solve slavery peacefully. It was an evil, but one side refused to acknowledge it was evil because it was too big of an admission for them to make. Doesn’t that feel that way now? That this defiant refusal to reverse this decline argues against the survival of a country. What does that leave you with? It leaves you with you need to make war to bring peace because you have a side that cannot change. Because then that means the admission that their beliefs have been corrupt all the time. So, in a way, you have to force them to surrender.
Pfff
Fucking hopeless. I mean I don't disagree with him on the matter regarding urban areas and criminality, but his "imperfect analogy" is just plain wrong; the civil war has never been fought over the moral issue of slavery, it's a myth, it's jewlywood craporama
>“Only certain people get criminal mulligans and Jan. 6 protestors, they don’t get criminal mulligans and here’s why. They’re the oppressor. So the oppressed get criminal mulligans. The people who are complaining, like us, we’re actually oppressors and we’re losing power so that’s why we are upset. I just got a job at MSNBC.
So let’s compare the rights between criminals and victims, ok? Criminals get a mulligan, they can steal up to $900 worth of stuff, they can loiter, sleep, and shoot up in public areas including playgrounds, they can loot and burn and call it social justice. They can pile up dozens of arrests and never do time. Meanwhile, what about us? Well we have to change our lives to accommodate risk wherever we go. We have to move out of cities for the sake of the safety of our families and our own safety. That’s what’s happening.
We are being driven out of cities by the oppressed, so I return to my **imperfect analogy** from yesterday. **We had a war over slavery. We knew slavery was inhumane and immoral, but somehow we couldn’t solve slavery peacefully. It was an evil, but one side refused to acknowledge it was evil because it was too big of an admission for them to make.**
Doesn’t that feel that way now? That this defiant refusal to reverse this decline argues against the survival of a country. What does that leave you with? It leaves you with you need to make war to bring peace because you have a side that cannot change. Because then that means the admission that their beliefs have been corrupt all the time. So, in a way, you have to force them to surrender.
Pfff
Fucking hopeless. I mean I don't disagree with him on the matter regarding urban areas and criminality, but his "imperfect analogy" is just plain wrong; the civil war has never been fought over the moral issue of slavery, it's a myth, it's jewlywood craporama
While the ACW did not start because of slavery, Lincoln made it part of his platform in the 1864 election, hence the passege into time, and skewed history. Most notable, is the exclusion of jews in any connection to slavery in this period.
While the ACW did not start because of slavery, Lincoln made it part of his platform in the 1864 election, hence the passege into time, and skewed history. Most notable, is the exclusion of jews in any connection to slavery in this period.
Attention grab-ass news kike(*) who thinks he's charming and funny uses lots of words to say nothing, because (a) he's in love with the sound of his own dopey mouth, and (b) he's a fucking media kike(*).
That mealy-mouthed shithead needs to be working for an angry, fat, black McDonald's manager who verbally abuses the dishwashers.
(*) Literally.
>Attention grab-ass news kike(\*) who thinks he's charming and funny uses lots of words to say nothing, because (a) he's in love with the sound of his own dopey mouth, and (b) he's a fucking media kike(\*).
That mealy-mouthed shithead needs to be working for an angry, fat, black McDonald's manager who verbally abuses the dishwashers.
(*) Literally.
(post is archived)