WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

Reuters authors Linda So, Peter Eisler and Jason Szep kvetch for 24 paragraphs, bury the lede on the 25th, kvetch some more for 14 paragraphs. Much ado about nothing.

25th paragraph -

In all, county officials referred at least 100 messages and social media posts to FBI and state counter-terrorism officials. Reuters found no evidence in the correspondence that officials saw any of the messages as breaching the expansive definition of constitutionally protected free speech and crossing into the territory of a prosecutable threat.

Reuters authors Linda So, Peter Eisler and Jason Szep kvetch for 24 paragraphs, bury the lede on the 25th, kvetch some more for 14 paragraphs. Much ado about nothing. 25th paragraph - >In all, county officials referred at least 100 messages and social media posts to FBI and state counter-terrorism officials. Reuters found no evidence in the correspondence that officials saw any of the messages as breaching the expansive definition of constitutionally protected free speech and crossing into the territory of a prosecutable threat.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Left wing election tactic.

[–] 1 pt

lol 24 paragraphs of "blah blah I'm so scared. Someone said a mean thing !!1! Boo hoo!1!".

Then the punch line.

Then 14 paragraphs of "Authorities have said things because they are saying things !1!!" and "Website that don't support communits are publishing falsities !1!!"

That article is ham-fisted propaganda. It's another setup for yet more propaganda of "stolen election" after those niggers lose in spite of their fucking little collusion and fraud schemes.

The (((propaganda machines))) are continuing to eat their own shit. They've been doing this for about 6 years by now.