The left can't meme, but the right can't write.

613

•

It'd not like now is a bad time for a far right takeover of media.

Most people are fed up with derivative recycled garbage that the left produces, and the empty sentimental platitudes that are as devoid of meaning as they are disconnected from reality, people want to see actual ideas being argued for in their fiction, stuff they hadn't considered before being presented to them to occupy their atrophied unused brains with.

The advance of technology has made it more accessible than ever for new amateur creators to make something, if we were able to get a specialized team together, we'd be able to make something great, unfortunately, we are unable or unwilling to make collaboration.

We expect anyone with an idea for a project to do it all themselves, we see that the proposed work is not 100 percent in line with our beleifs, and insist on something that is just pure predictable and uncreative propaganda that just smacks people in the face with the message, no subtlety or room for audience engagement-of-thinking, it is just unenjoyable garbage. The plot basically boils down to "our side good beats up their side bad", it's what an untalented child would come up with.

The other issue is opposite, people making something way too complex and unworkable, then refusing to strip things down to a more simple essence that can then be built on, rather than a colossal cluster fuck of ideas that just don't work together, ambition is good, but so is discretion, find a balance.

The last issue is that they are tone deaf to the pre existing biases of their audiences, for their first work, they want to put in the historical Adolf Hitler as the hero within their first work and not clad it in even a shred of irony, it's like they are making stuff for themselves rather than for a market, they fail to realize that there are certain images, words, and ideas that are instantly going to cause the audience members to shut off their brains, you need to go in gradually and cleverly with this kind of stuff, bring it in under disguise, focusing on dodging the landmines by way of starting with the more peripheral ideas that the audience was likely not conditioned against, then moving towards the more blatant parts of the ideology. For example, Start with a philosophical approach that examines various situations that lead to the real world issues our philosophy seeks to address. Plausible deniability is maintained, so the audience can still enjoy it, we are just talking about reality, after all. Then move onto points about science, where we show various strategies and how they turn out, concluding that nature favors a particular kind of morality, again, plausible deniability, just talking science here. Then we could cover how differences in ability leads to all manner of problems when the differently capable are visually distinguishable and no one is so much as willing to admit that these differences in ability exist between the groups, especially when the only idea they would engage with is that the most successful group is conspiring against the others, again, this is not saying that differently capable groups exist who can be easily told apart exist in real life, it's just a story about how things would progress if that were the case. And so on. Every time we make a work that deals with just one aspect of reality which the fiction of the establishment refuses to acknowledge, reality favors natsoc, so it's a good progression to name people think about things in hypotheticals (fictional settings with fictional peoples with no recognizable tie in to reality are great for distancing people from the real world biases around an idea, enabling it to be examined more freely), which will later bleed into how they consider reality when encountering similar situations.

Im just hashing stuff out here, so you might want to copy paste this into an editor to read it better, but I got some ideas here.

I don't know, what do you think?

We rule in the realm of online shitposting, but we fail in the realm of arts and media, we have no cultural impact in the areas of entertainment or educational media, which is a realm the kikes enjoy a monopoly on. It'd not like now is a bad time for a far right takeover of media. Most people are fed up with derivative recycled garbage that the left produces, and the empty sentimental platitudes that are as devoid of meaning as they are disconnected from reality, people want to see actual ideas being argued for in their fiction, stuff they hadn't considered before being presented to them to occupy their atrophied unused brains with. The advance of technology has made it more accessible than ever for new amateur creators to make something, if we were able to get a specialized team together, we'd be able to make something great, unfortunately, we are unable or unwilling to make collaboration. We expect anyone with an idea for a project to do it all themselves, we see that the proposed work is not 100 percent in line with our beleifs, and insist on something that is just pure predictable and uncreative propaganda that just smacks people in the face with the message, no subtlety or room for audience engagement-of-thinking, it is just unenjoyable garbage. The plot basically boils down to "our side good beats up their side bad", it's what an untalented child would come up with. The other issue is opposite, people making something way too complex and unworkable, then refusing to strip things down to a more simple essence that can then be built on, rather than a colossal cluster fuck of ideas that just don't work together, ambition is good, but so is discretion, find a balance. The last issue is that they are tone deaf to the pre existing biases of their audiences, for their first work, they want to put in the historical Adolf Hitler as the hero within their first work and not clad it in even a shred of irony, it's like they are making stuff for themselves rather than for a market, they fail to realize that there are certain images, words, and ideas that are instantly going to cause the audience members to shut off their brains, you need to go in gradually and cleverly with this kind of stuff, bring it in under disguise, focusing on dodging the landmines by way of starting with the more peripheral ideas that the audience was likely not conditioned against, then moving towards the more blatant parts of the ideology. For example, Start with a philosophical approach that examines various situations that lead to the real world issues our philosophy seeks to address. Plausible deniability is maintained, so the audience can still enjoy it, we are just talking about reality, after all. Then move onto points about science, where we show various strategies and how they turn out, concluding that nature favors a particular kind of morality, again, plausible deniability, just talking science here. Then we could cover how differences in ability leads to all manner of problems when the differently capable are visually distinguishable and no one is so much as willing to admit that these differences in ability exist between the groups, especially when the only idea they would engage with is that the most successful group is conspiring against the others, again, this is not saying that differently capable groups exist who can be easily told apart exist in real life, it's just a story about how things would progress if that were the case. And so on. Every time we make a work that deals with just one aspect of reality which the fiction of the establishment refuses to acknowledge, reality favors natsoc, so it's a good progression to name people think about things in hypotheticals (fictional settings with fictional peoples with no recognizable tie in to reality are great for distancing people from the real world biases around an idea, enabling it to be examined more freely), which will later bleed into how they consider reality when encountering similar situations. Im just hashing stuff out here, so you might want to copy paste this into an editor to read it better, but I got some ideas here. I don't know, what do you think?

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

For example, niggers, and to a lesser extent Hispanics, do almost all of the violent crime. We all know this, or if we don't, we should, because the evidence is undeniable. But when you see rapists or shoplifters or assaulters on television, most of the time they are white. This is ridiculous, but it is the pattern. It wasn't always like this. Back in the 1970s there were black pimps and crooks on television all the time. Look at old series like Baretta and Starsky & Hutch. Look at the Dirty Harry movies. But today, the muggers are white. House intruders are white. Rapists are white. This is contrary to real life.

Another ridiculous unreality we see all the time -- the top research scientist on television shows is black. In real life, there are no black research scientists, or not enough of them to make up a basketball team, but they are everywhere on TV and in the movies. We don't have black research scientists because the average nigger IQ is 15 points lower than the average white IQ in America, and 30 points lower in Africa. Even brilliant niggers are only average by white standards.

Women is another unreality. Movies almost never show women enjoying taking care of the home and raising their children. Hollywood has to give all of them important, exciting careers, which miraculously they manage to follow while still keeping a perfectly clean and neat house,and raising polite, well-behaved children. Or more often than not, the women are single and their career is the only important thing in their lives -- more important than their husband, if they are even married, more important than their marriage, more important than having children. In reality these women are severely disfuntional, but on television they are the ideal.

You never see the Nazis treated like human beings on television or in movies -- never. They are always presented as cartoon monsters who only want to torture and murder. Yet in real life they were just human beings, trying to do what was right for their homeland and their people.

You never see the social norms and customs of past generations treated truthfully on television or in movies. The past is always distorted through a politically-correct lens, so that the characters hold social views that correspond with those of modern liberals, or if they are villains, with modern conservatives. Most people have no conception that in past generations, people did not hold the same views we hold today. It's beyond their comprehension that those views might have been just as valid, or even more valid, than the views held today. They can't put themselves into the minds of the people of past eras, and a lot of that is due to the failure of Hollywood to present past viewpoints honestly and openly.

What annoys me most about Hollywood (the word I use for the generic Jew crap we see on television and in the theaters) is that certain vital areas of life are never even referred to. It's as if they don't exist. It's not just what Hollywood promotes in its propaganda that irritates, it's what they completely suppress and deny. This includes many of the basic, everyday realities of life. For example, niggers, and to a lesser extent Hispanics, do almost all of the violent crime. We all know this, or if we don't, we should, because the evidence is undeniable. But when you see rapists or shoplifters or assaulters on television, most of the time they are white. This is ridiculous, but it is the pattern. It wasn't always like this. Back in the 1970s there were black pimps and crooks on television all the time. Look at old series like Baretta and Starsky & Hutch. Look at the Dirty Harry movies. But today, the muggers are white. House intruders are white. Rapists are white. This is contrary to real life. Another ridiculous unreality we see all the time -- the top research scientist on television shows is black. In real life, there are no black research scientists, or not enough of them to make up a basketball team, but they are everywhere on TV and in the movies. We don't have black research scientists because the average nigger IQ is 15 points lower than the average white IQ in America, and 30 points lower in Africa. Even brilliant niggers are only average by white standards. Women is another unreality. Movies almost never show women enjoying taking care of the home and raising their children. Hollywood has to give all of them important, exciting careers, which miraculously they manage to follow while still keeping a perfectly clean and neat house,and raising polite, well-behaved children. Or more often than not, the women are single and their career is the only important thing in their lives -- more important than their husband, if they are even married, more important than their marriage, more important than having children. In reality these women are severely disfuntional, but on television they are the ideal. You never see the Nazis treated like human beings on television or in movies -- never. They are always presented as cartoon monsters who only want to torture and murder. Yet in real life they were just human beings, trying to do what was right for their homeland and their people. You never see the social norms and customs of past generations treated truthfully on television or in movies. The past is always distorted through a politically-correct lens, so that the characters hold social views that correspond with those of modern liberals, or if they are villains, with modern conservatives. Most people have no conception that in past generations, people did not hold the same views we hold today. It's beyond their comprehension that those views might have been just as valid, or even more valid, than the views held today. They can't put themselves into the minds of the people of past eras, and a lot of that is due to the failure of Hollywood to present past viewpoints honestly and openly.

link

(post is archived)