To understand Trump’s support, we must think in terms of multiracial Whiteness

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

(edited )

The double-speak is powerful with this one. Let me use a Lefty phrase I hate: "Let's unpack this one."

First we need to understand that it isn't about color any longer. This is obvious from the implicit negation in the phrase: multi-racial whiteness. It's implied by this term that it isn't, in fact, about the white race at all. If a non-white can demonstrate whiteness, then we're talking abut something other than ethnicity.

What we are necessarily discussing at this point is Western culture. It's something attached to the European races, but they are simply using the color term now as a stand-in for the actual reference. It's just Western culture.

They are telling you that the enemy is that which holds ideals corresponding to traditionally Western ideals.

They're attacking a history and a shared value-culture, not a color at this point, and it's getting so strained in its use that it is no longer even logical. It's just barely hiding what they truly mean, and it isn't hiding anything at all for anyone moderately intelligent.

Anything based on the concept of a universal set of basic human rights, contingently with rights that are not human rights, a universal notion of the Good, of Justice, and of what is Beautiful. This means morality based on first principles, legal systems which adhere to these principles (i.e. natural law), and also an aesthetic which can be gleaned from the heaven-pointing architecture of Europe in the previous centuries.

This is an attack on that value-culture. You become 'white', regardless of your ethnicity, if you believe in any of the foundations or logical extensions of Western religion and philosophy. Things like merit-based hierarchies, law and order, justice regardless of racial identity, good and evil, private property, free speech, a government concept structured upon its fundamental opposition and antagonism to its people...these are what they're coming after. These are what make it possible to be multiracially white: any recognition of the supremacy of Western culture and what it has accomplished, or the thought that it ought to be preserved for future generations.

The double-speak is powerful with this one. Let me use a Lefty phrase I hate: "Let's unpack this one." First we need to understand that it isn't about color any longer. This is obvious from the implicit negation in the phrase: multi-racial whiteness. It's implied by this term that it isn't, in fact, about the white race at all. If a non-white can demonstrate whiteness, then we're talking abut something other than ethnicity. What we are necessarily discussing at this point is Western culture. It's something attached to the European races, but they are simply using the color term now as a stand-in for the actual reference. It's just Western culture. They are telling you that the enemy is that which holds ideals corresponding to traditionally Western ideals. They're attacking a history and a shared value-culture, not a color at this point, and it's getting so strained in its use that it is no longer even logical. It's just barely hiding what they truly mean, and it isn't hiding anything at all for anyone moderately intelligent. Anything based on the concept of a universal set of basic human rights, contingently with rights that are *not human rights*, a universal notion of the Good, of Justice, and of what is Beautiful. This means morality based on first principles, legal systems which adhere to these principles (i.e. natural law), and also an aesthetic which can be gleaned from the heaven-pointing architecture of Europe in the previous centuries. This is an attack on that value-culture. You become 'white', regardless of your ethnicity, if you believe in any of the foundations or logical extensions of Western religion and philosophy. Things like merit-based hierarchies, law and order, justice regardless of racial identity, good and evil, private property, free speech, a government concept structured upon its fundamental *opposition* and antagonism to its people...these are what they're coming after. These are what make it possible to be multiracially white: any recognition of the supremacy of Western culture and what it has accomplished, or the thought that it ought to be preserved for future generations.

link

[–] • 1 pt

The mental gymnastics is pretty average here. Good effort, but they write an awful lot of words just to say: we hate white people and any non white that sympathizes with whites.

link