He didn't even name the jew. He said it was "a community you know well" to a journalist. For this statement, (((they))) are asking for him to be prosecuted. If you didn't already know what the (((problem))) in France was, this interview would not have informed you at all. Yet they are trying to prosecute him, and the journalist was shaking in rage near the end of the interview.
how can he be prosecuted for that? even if he did name the jew.. which he damn well should have, playing around with these terms only grants them a further illusion of power.
There is no constitutional freedom of speech in Europe.
Its disappearing in the usa.
how can he be prosecuted for that?
Who knows. They might not succeed, but they are trying. It really goes to show the power (((they))) have.
This falls under "incitement/call for racial hatred" essentially, you can't say "all arabs should be deported out of europe" in france (and in most european countries btw) or "muslims are terrorists", same deal. I mean, you can say it, but if you say it publicly, on air or on the intarwebs or IRL, anybody, including the state, has a right to sue you on that basis and they'll likely win.
Yeah I know it sucks hard, and at the same time it goes both ways, meaning that, this is why you can't have celebs on tv telling everybody "whites are evil and should be erased from history" in france for instance, you can hardly embrace a race baiter career over there, unless of course you insist on turning your life into a judicial nightmare. It's going to be a very costly hobby, at best. First offense is usually a fine, and if you keep insisting on making such statements despite the fact that you lost a couple of times in court already, you get sent to prison, and if you still insist after that... It's going to pile on
That's why you can't have a direct copy-pasta from the US to France/europe when it comes to the so called critical race theory and the rest of the race based leftist subversion tactics, because it's illegal "by nature" over there. They've tried, they've failed badly already. You can't have class rooms for POCs only, same deal
Personally, I prefer the "full version" of freedom of speech, US style. Now it also comes with downsides, it gives a boulevard to leftist subversion and race baiter types like al sharpton and mad maxine, among other things
Saying "someone controls all of the major media and you know who that someone is", isn't a call to racial hatred because no race was mentioned. He didn't even advocate for splitting up the ownership of the media.
this why you can't have celebs on tv telling everybody "whites are evil and should be erased from history"
What about more subtle ways to call whites evil? Like "whites are still profiting from past and structural racism"?
but saying arabs should be deported is different from saying jews own the newspapers which are producing propaganda against the army. that is mere identification, not saying something should be done to x group. they have set the standard themselves by constantly saying whites as a racial group control this and that, and even go further by saying they need to be removed.
(post is archived)