![vomit inducing [618x1195 - 679KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/ITZzS4.png){kind=link}
They're also supposed to be sort of unearthly beautiful, like elves or something. Fine, sharp features- not big lipped, mouth-breathing chimps with sheep wool for hair.
They're never described as albinos in the novels, but if you're looking for something to compare what they should look like to, that's not the worst. Not sure where you got this idea that they are supposed to look sickly; maybe some individuals were sickly, but "looking sickly" is not a "Valeryian trait".
They're also supposed to be sort of unearthly beautiful
Some.
Some very ugly, hideous. Coin flip for the mad ones.
Valeryian trait".
Targaryen*
Valeryian is the race. Targaryen is a family who descends from this dying race.
If your family name was "dadu", but you're also a kike, I wouldn't say "being a faggot is a dadu trait", I'd say "being a faggot is a typical jew trait".
Also I question the nature of some of the historical (fictional) accounts of ugly Targaryen leaders. Never forget who's writing these histories- they are politically motivated. Do you think Maelys the Monstrous actually had two heads? Probably not. But the mists of time give way to legend.
Valeryian is the race. Targaryen is a family who descends from this dying race.
Which is why I suggested that correction you because I said Targaryen in the comment you quoted, not Valeryian. The context clues that show I am tlaking about Targaryens is the subject in the video screenshot and my reference to the coin flip of madness.
(post is archived)