WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

Is it their tone? Mean people are more likely to be wrong?

Is it how many people agree with them?

Is it the authority figures that agree with them?

Is it the evidence/support they bring to the table?

Is it the stories they tell about the information/event/person that convince you?

Is it how confident they seem to be about their position?

Is it their tone? Mean people are more likely to be wrong? Is it how many people agree with them? Is it the authority figures that agree with them? Is it the evidence/support they bring to the table? Is it the stories they tell about the information/event/person that convince you? Is it how confident they seem to be about their position?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Look, you're at it again

You AGAIN dishonestly trying to corner the debate to get it your way, with your binary/false choice/blackAndWhite thinking

"either you are with us or with the terrorists"

>You either need evidence to believe one narrative or another, or you accept something based on Jewish (or derivative) programming.

Right there

It's pure sophism, zero, null, fail

You ask what my agenda is?

Self improvement, I discuss online for the sport, that's my agenda

...

Now, to conclude, "Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence"

Nobody said facts are irrelevant

However, you often run into situations where facts are lacking, like WWII, when everything got so bombed to shit nobody can tell for sure what really happened...

Too bad, the most important topics, lack facts....

That's the limit, self imposed limit, for you

[–] 1 pt

You AGAIN dishonestly trying to corner the debate to get it your way, with your binary/false choice/blackAndWhite thinking

Oh yeah? How's that. Quote me exactly where you think that's happening.

It's pure sophism, zero, null, fail

Grats on quoting it. How am I wrong?

Self improvement, I discuss online for the sport, that's my agenda

But improving how you process information isn't valuable or worthwhile to you? You think I'm wrong? Show me.

Now, to conclude, absence of evidence isn't proof of absence

Who said anything about that?

You either actively believe something or not. Why you choose to believe something matters, does it not?

If you have no evidence, why believe something? Maybe tentatively, or hypothetically, but at least do some due diligence and try to get evidence to support whether it's right or not.

However, you often run into situation where facts are lacking, like WWII, when everything got so bombed to shit nobody can tell for sure what really happened...

HAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You mean the holocaust? I can utterly disprove it with evidence and facts.

Too bad, the most important topics, lack facts....

Horseshit.

That's the limit, self imposed limit, for you

HAHAHAHAHA

Eat your heart out. Absolutely fully sourced. Myriad absolute proofs that the holocaust was a hoax. Myriad more can be found by taking other facts from the Nuremberg Trials themselves, from the U.N., from Holohoax museums and websites, and from nearly every publication about it.

Enjoy your lies and Marxist idea of truth.

[–] 0 pt

My god, I obviously hit a nerve right fucking there lol

Why are you even mad?

Why are you quoting me hysterically as if you were butthurt like never before lol

...

Rhetorical question

Good night

[–] 1 pt

Why are you even mad?

Tone fallacy. But nice try, Marxist.

Why are you quoting me hysterically as if you were butthurt like never before lol

Oh, you don't like each of your points being addressed, with the quoted text available so you can't weasel your way out of them?

Rhetorical question

I bet.

Good night

How does it feel to lose?