WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

162

Is it their tone? Mean people are more likely to be wrong?

Is it how many people agree with them?

Is it the authority figures that agree with them?

Is it the evidence/support they bring to the table?

Is it the stories they tell about the information/event/person that convince you?

Is it how confident they seem to be about their position?

Is it their tone? Mean people are more likely to be wrong? Is it how many people agree with them? Is it the authority figures that agree with them? Is it the evidence/support they bring to the table? Is it the stories they tell about the information/event/person that convince you? Is it how confident they seem to be about their position?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Yeah ok again

That's MY answer to YOUR question

>Either you are honest or you are not, either you want to get to the bottom of truth or you're trying to do something else, like avoiding a particular truth >You can't figure out the truth by lying to yourself, it's just incompatible >People can see dishonesty for what it is, and when someone is dishonest... That someone isn't truthful

THAT'S MY ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION:

>When attempting to figure out the truth of claims on either side of an issue, what is the most important indicator of who's right and wrong for you?

And no, that choice isn't in your list, and no, I'm not satisfied with the poor choices you left me with for available answers

Your "right answer" isn't enough FOR ME

Take it or leave it

End of debate

[–] 1 pt

That's MY answer to YOUR question

What is?

THAT'S MY ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION:

So this:

When attempting to figure out the truth of claims on either side of an issue, what is the most important indicator of who's right and wrong for you?

Answered by this:

when someone is dishonest... That someone isn't truthful

Thanks, Mr. Miyagi, for the non-answer.

And this:

People can see dishonesty for what it is

Is horseshit, because a lot of people believe CNN still.

Conmen wouldn't be a thing, and Jews wouldn't be in power, if people could "see dishonesty for what it is".

And no, that choice isn't in your list, and no, I'm not satisfied with the poor choices you left me with for available answers

You didn't answer anything. It was the most pussy-footing non-answer I've seen in a long time. What's important FOR YOU? What part of your response constitutes an answer to that query? At best your meandering horseshit is a precursor to a statement of "X is my answer". I offered alternatives, but in no way closed the debate to those options - yet you managed still, despite the open-ended question, to not even answer the main question.

Your "right answer" isn't enough FOR ME

Yours isn't even an answer. It's a bunch of "either-or" statements, "people can see X", then a veritable tautology that in no way answers any question asked.

Take it or leave it

You're not even capable of a straight answer.

End of debate

I bet it is.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I gave you a straight answer

However, you fail to accept it as such, BECAUSE, you seek validation for your stupidity over voat, you want people to answer what YOU want to hear

Which is dishonest, just admit it

And yes the debate is over my dishonest friend, since a while now

[–] 1 pt

I gave you a straight answer

What, exactly was straight about a bunch of "either-or" statements, a patently absurd "people can see X", then basically "people that don't tell the truth are dishonest"?

That answered zero questions.

However, you fail to accept it as such, BECAUSE, you seek validation for your stupidity over voat, you want people to answer what YOU want to hear

A straight answer? Kek. Seems you have issues with communication, or basic question-answering abilities. I'm not really sure where your cognitive malfunction is.

Which is dishonest, just admit it

Not giving an actual answer, then claiming you have, is dishonest.

And yes the debate is over my dishonest friend, since a while now

Yeah, because you can't answer a question without a bunch of sophistry and outright laughable claims that, even if true, don't answer the question.