Agreed. Everything I've used flatpak based has acted funny. But that's not the point, is it? When a company and distro decide what you can and can't use, is it really free and open source?
When a company and distro decide what you can and can't use, is it really free and open source?
Does 'open source' include all vendors and third-party associations as well, or just the code for the operating system?
Android is a close code example of Linux being used. Ubuntu claims to still be "free and open source". So, at least to me, free and open source would mean maintaining your own package system, but giving people easy access to other options should they need or want it.
I wonder if the community will figure out a way to continue to use Flatpak on Ubuntu.
(post is archived)