Worse aspects of Slackware and Arch, without any real benefit that isn't found or done better elsewhere. Besides being a bitch and a half to get installed (worse than Arch or Slackware, which is saying something), the compile times for software are (Or were the 2 times I tried it years back) were absolutely insane.
I get why it's "neat" to build from source, but in my daily driver, I have no desire to waste an entire afternoon/evening doing updates. With Slackware, you KNOW your building a frozen machine, and you plan around it. Arch goes the opposite way, and you know your getting a rolling bleeding release, but you also have very quick and snappy updating as well as surprisingly good stability.
I get why Gentoo exists, but I see it as a hobbyist distro as opposed to something you'd want to get real work done, or a rig for coming home and relaxing with 15 tabs open and a steam game playing.
P.S.: if you head over to protondb, and look up used distros when people reviews, more often than not the Gentoo users cannot play even very simple games where a *Buntu, Arch, or Fedora distro can
Fair point about gamers, not one, but I don't really agree with the daily driver bit. It's my only distro, runs on three machines, and with distcc and throttles updates are a non issue as they can run in the background. I update ~once a month and machines have been stable for years.
I'll check out the references you mentioned appreciate the tip.
(post is archived)