Oh I am totally in agreement - the idea is to introduce an alternative without also too much friction.
It's more like contextual UI actions: right-click, drag and drop, etc.. functions that MS has as their sort of UI ingrained, while linux can vary throughout flavors.
Yep. XFCE doesn't do anything too weird there. It's more of a project to provide people's expectations rather than a design project to do something unique. It's very very boring and does things in an MS way.
It can be a feature short here or there (not much), but 98% of it is there, and that 98% that is there is organized the way you would expect it.
When you install XFCE directly it comes under configured. If you use Artix or Manjaro you are going to get an arch system with everything pre-installed, including the XFCE configured correctly out of the box. So really the first question is if you like debian or arch for yourself. If debian I would go with Mint. It's also a sane desktop. If arch then you ask if you personally like OpenRC or SystemD. If openRC then Artix, systemD->Manjaro.
(post is archived)