WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

421

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts (edited )

Libertarianism is a modified hangout. I say this because of the "non-aggression principle".

Libertarians cling to the deluded belief that people should be free up until the point where they would cause harm to others.

They naively refuse to put any protections in place to defend their society and culture from those who use more subversive tactics to amass all of the wealth and control, and then use that power to exact violence on the libertarian rubes who continue to adhere to the "principle", leaving themselves largely defenseless as a group.

Libertarianism can't work and is a joke. It's a mind virus used to control people who would otherwise "get it", lulling them into a non-violent, passive coma where they are powerless to stop nefarious groups oppressing them.

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

Libertarianism is a white concept. White people, can live like that no problem, but toss in something non white and everything goes to hell.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

It's all about that non-aggression principle, but who defines what is and isn't aggression? Perhaps that's what makes it salvageable though. For example, if I define propagandizing my kids--which encourages nonreproductive lifestyles--as a violation of the NAP, I can then defend myself and my kids, with force if necessary. Welcome to Dark Libertarianism.

[–] 2 pts

I'm down with dark libertarianism then, as long as it includes organized defense.

[–] 1 pt

Aggression can be subjective.

For example, is it aggressive if, when walking passed you in the opposite direction, our shoulders collide? Possible aggressive behavior from me... possibly also just an accident.

Then you have objective aggression, where a person makes a determination to engage in violence against someone unprovoked.

Non aggression to them means passive aggression.

[–] 0 pt

It's Hans-Herman Hoppe who's a Paleolibertarian I think would probably most align with the form of libertarianism that would be a bit more by force.

Pretty sure Hoppe is a monarchist. Check out his book Democracy: The God That Failed.

[–] 6 pts

Hamilton was a Rothschild plant. Fuck that dude and his central bank.

[–] 0 pt

He was raised in a hebrew colony, I'm sure he learned a lot over there.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

They technically created a safe space via violence.

[–] 0 pt

Now days with child labor laws, they each would have been getting their first jobs at that age after over a dozen years of jewish indoctrination.