![Libertarianism vs Socialism [720x557 - 65KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/LhUVRj.jpg){kind=link}
I don't think you actually understand what has been stated. It's not that I don't understand your point. But you also misrepresent my point. Which confirms you don't understand it.
For example, as a contributor, I could spend my time doing just about anything. But I didn't. You're not wrong, about some of your comments. But it doesn't change you fail to understand the underlying point. As I have repeatedly stated, since no such society exists, speculation is required when this is your setting. Feel free to pretend this hasn't repeatedly been stated. And feel free to tear it up. It is imaginary after all. But at the end of the day, some of your own conjecture, based on what is currently known, is already known to be wrong.
To each his own.
If the only thing that’s wrong is minor details that relate to your personal habits then it’s not even worth worrying about.
I refuse to believe that people sit down and code open source software without some sort of self benefit. Most tools put out there are created so the authors can also use them themselves.
My point still stands that you will never have a functional system that depends on others volunteering to do work that provides them no value. There is always some obvious or hidden value that somebody gets from the performance of some action.
I refuse to believe that people sit down and code open source software without some sort of self benefit. Most tools put out there are created so the authors can also use them themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqk_nWAjBus
Checkmate.
We're done.
Looks like a toy to me. It was made for pleasure. Weak argument.
(post is archived)