Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

338

Yes, this SHOULD be done. If you allow anyone to sue for "climate change" you will end up with every business... going out of business.

Archive: https://archive.today/Fweeg

From the post:

>Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms—even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount. It’s the latest in a counter-offensive that has unfolded on multiple fronts, from the halls of Congress and the White House to courts and state attorneys general offices across the country.

Yes, this SHOULD be done. If you allow anyone to sue for "climate change" you will end up with every business... going out of business. Archive: https://archive.today/Fweeg From the post: >>Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms—even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount. It’s the latest in a counter-offensive that has unfolded on multiple fronts, from the halls of Congress and the White House to courts and state attorneys general offices across the country.
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

This won't be used for the fake nonsense that is climate change, as the bill says. It will be used to remove liability for environmental damage which happens and is abhorrent. Kike's gonna kike, you should not support this.

"Yes, this SHOULD be done. If you allow anyone to sue for "climate change" you will end up with every business... going out of business. "

You are truly retarded. "kikes are telling the truth about what a bill would be used for!" The EXACT same type of thing was done for (((vaccines))). Because, you know, vaccines are presumably good, right?