WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

Archive: https://archive.today/AaZuA

From the post:

>On February 10, 2026, Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that 31 documents that a defendant, Bradley Heppner, generated using a third-party AI tool (the “AI-Generated Documents”) were not protected by either the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. Judge Rakoff’s ruling in the case, U.S. v. Heppner, appears to be the first in which a court determined that interactions with a publicly accessible AI tool based on prompts that contain privileged information are not themselves privileged.

Archive: https://archive.today/AaZuA From the post: >>On February 10, 2026, Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that 31 documents that a defendant, Bradley Heppner, generated using a third-party AI tool (the “AI-Generated Documents”) were not protected by either the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. Judge Rakoff’s ruling in the case, U.S. v. Heppner, appears to be the first in which a court determined that interactions with a publicly accessible AI tool based on prompts that contain privileged information are not themselves privileged.

Be the first to comment!