WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

882

That is a interesting argument.

Archive: https://archive.today/nWXFI

From the post:

>The Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited ruling in Commonwealth v. Kurtz today, on whether there are Fourth Amendment rights in Google search terms. Among the seven Justices, three took on that question and said no, the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution do not apply. (One Justice said that she would say no if she had to reach it, but she didn't have to reach it, so she would not take a position.)

That is a interesting argument. Archive: https://archive.today/nWXFI From the post: >>The Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited ruling in Commonwealth v. Kurtz today, on whether there are Fourth Amendment rights in Google search terms. Among the seven Justices, three took on that question and said no, the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution do not apply. (One Justice said that she would say no if she had to reach it, but she didn't have to reach it, so she would not take a position.)

(post is archived)