Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

President Biden’s pardon of Dr. Anthony Fauci may protect the former National Institutes of Health official from immediate criminal prosecution, but some critics say he is not completely out of legal jeopardy and that public sentiment might still condemn the man who became known during the COVID-19 pandemic as “Mr. Science.”

In the days before Biden offered the pardon to Fauci, along with other critics of Donald Trump, some experts who have followed Fauci’s career and handling of the pandemic, as well as members of the Trump transition team, reiterated their assertion that Fauci perjured himself on several occasions during the pandemic – especially regarding his agency’s links to the lab in Wuhan, China, that might have created the virus that causes COVID-19.

The pardon addresses any COVID-related offenses, and is backdated to 2014—the year a U.S. ban on so-called "gain of function" virus research took effect -- research Fauci is accused of outsourcing to China.

Despite reporting that Trump is bent on revenge, the appetite among MAGA appointees for holding Fauci accountable hasn’t been particularly vocal. But former Senate investigator Jason Foster, who now runs the whistleblower nonprofit Empower Oversight, says that Biden’s pardon creates new legal jeopardy for Fauci. Sen. Rand Paul has vowed to continue investigating the COVID origins question, and sources tell RealClearInvestigations that Sen. Ron Johnson and House Republican investigators plan to do so as well. When testifying in those inquiries or answering written depositions, Fauci will be unable to dodge questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination. “They can ask him if he lied before, replough old ground,” Foster said. “And if he lies about any prior lie, he can be prosecuted for that or held in contempt.”

Andrew Noymer, associate professor of population health and disease prevention at the University of California, Irvine, said such hearings are necessary for scientific and historical reasons. “I’m hopeful that he will now come clean about everything he knows about the origins of the virus,” Noymer said. “For the sake of public trust in science – explaining what killed 20 million people – that a complete account is much more important than speculation about what criminal penalties he may have avoided.”

“These pardons will not stop Department of Justice investigations,” said one adviser to the Trump transition team, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “We expected this and look at it as a predicate to get truth from people who can no longer use the Fifth Amendment. Now we can bring every one of them in front of a grand jury.”

Legacy media outlets promoted Fauci throughout the pandemic. There is no consensus on Fauci’s handling of the pandemic. Legacy media outlets have promoted Fauci throughout the pandemic as “America’s doctor” who “sticks to the facts” and applauded him as “the nation’s top infectious disease expert.” When he retired from the NIH after five decades in 2022, the New York Times granted him space on its opinion page to advise the next generation of scientists, citing his own accomplishments. . .

>President Biden’s pardon of Dr. Anthony Fauci may protect the former National Institutes of Health official from immediate criminal prosecution, but some critics say he is not completely out of legal jeopardy and that public sentiment might still condemn the man who became known during the COVID-19 pandemic as “Mr. Science.” >In the days before Biden offered the pardon to Fauci, along with other critics of Donald Trump, some experts who have followed Fauci’s career and handling of the pandemic, as well as members of the Trump transition team, reiterated their assertion that Fauci perjured himself on several occasions during the pandemic – especially regarding his agency’s links to the lab in Wuhan, China, that might have created the virus that causes COVID-19. >The pardon addresses any COVID-related offenses, and is backdated to 2014—the year a U.S. ban on so-called "gain of function" virus research took effect -- research Fauci is accused of outsourcing to China. >Despite reporting that Trump is bent on revenge, the appetite among MAGA appointees for holding Fauci accountable hasn’t been particularly vocal. But former Senate investigator Jason Foster, who now runs the whistleblower nonprofit Empower Oversight, says that Biden’s pardon creates new legal jeopardy for Fauci. Sen. Rand Paul has vowed to continue investigating the COVID origins question, and sources tell RealClearInvestigations that Sen. Ron Johnson and House Republican investigators plan to do so as well. When testifying in those inquiries or answering written depositions, Fauci will be unable to dodge questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination. “They can ask him if he lied before, replough old ground,” Foster said. “And if he lies about any prior lie, he can be prosecuted for that or held in contempt.” >Andrew Noymer, associate professor of population health and disease prevention at the University of California, Irvine, said such hearings are necessary for scientific and historical reasons. “I’m hopeful that he will now come clean about everything he knows about the origins of the virus,” Noymer said. “For the sake of public trust in science – explaining what killed 20 million people – that a complete account is much more important than speculation about what criminal penalties he may have avoided.” >**“These pardons will not stop Department of Justice investigations,” said one adviser to the Trump transition team, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “We expected this and look at it as a predicate to get truth from people who can no longer use the Fifth Amendment. Now we can bring every one of them in front of a grand jury.”** >Legacy media outlets promoted Fauci throughout the pandemic. There is no consensus on Fauci’s handling of the pandemic. Legacy media outlets have promoted Fauci throughout the pandemic as “America’s doctor” who “sticks to the facts” and applauded him as “the nation’s top infectious disease expert.” When he retired from the NIH after five decades in 2022, the New York Times granted him space on its opinion page to advise the next generation of scientists, citing his own accomplishments. . . [Source](https://www.zerohedge.com/political/despite-biden-pardon-fauci-still-faces-legal-perils-here-they-are)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 0 pt

I try to focus it on what I think is the important stuff.

Like ignoring the (((elephant))) in the room.

[–] • 0 pt

Like ignoring the (((elephant))) in the room.

I don't consider $500M to black Americans to be an elephant in the room. Thst's legacy residual bullshit initiated by LBJ's great society. Kill everything race based, get us bsck to a merit based society and those issues go away.

And (((that elephant))) gets noticed on POAL. I'm on POAL. I'm noticing too. How to overcome (((that elephant))) is always in the back of my mind. When I believe I have the "final solution", I'll let you know. All I have at the moment is forcing AIPAC to register as foreign agents, end dual citizenship, inform the masses of the kikery they have committed so those asleep will notice too. Remember, I'm a constitutionalist. Every American has the same rights as me. Kicking undesireable Americans out of the country is not an option. So I am more interested in neutering their power and influence over America. (((Their))) tentacles are everywhere. I think Trump's agenda is a great start. It will take years to completely eliminate (((their))) influence, but I believe in the 80-20 rule. Trump could eliminate 80% of their influence with 20% of the effort. Eliminating the last 20% of (((their))) influence will take 4X more effort.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Every American has the same rights as me.

I already know you are ok with Whites being replaced, as long as it is done "legally"

I don't consider $500M to black Americans to be an elephant in the room.

I love how you deflect by pointing at the consequence and not the cause.

Trump is a jew-controlled puppet. He has to do some positive things in order to calm the down the angry goyim who has noticed them. It's part of the plan.

You can deny, put your finger in your ears and sing lalalalala all day long, it won't change that fact.

[–] • 0 pt

I already know you are ok with Whites being replaced, as long as it is done "legally"

OMG. Just stop. Americans will not stand for White replacement. We have a represntative government that has been infiltrated from within. Now that the cats are out of the bag and We The People are now aware that a war is being waged upon us, we respond. Trump is just the tip of the spear of that response. DEI eliminated, Borders sealed, Invaders being captured and removed ... and this is only day 3. The pendulum is swinging the other way, and quickly.

I love how you deflect by pointing at the consequence and not the cause.

How is that deflection? The only way to solve these problems is to take action to negate the consequences in order to be in any position to eliminate the cause. You talk in circles. How do you propose solving the problem without violating the constitution? How would you go about solving the problem by violating the constitution? What would be left of the fabric of this country if you take that path? I find that path very dangerous and destructive.