WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

195

I don't think this was a good ruling. The conservative judges are in the minority opinion.

The US supreme court has struck down a lower court ruling in the case of Murthy v Missouri, finding that the government’s communications with social media platforms about Covid-19 misinformation did not violate the first amendment. The court’s decision permits the government to call on tech companies to remove falsehoods and establishes boundaries around free speech online.

Archive (archive.today)

I don't think this was a good ruling. The conservative judges are in the minority opinion. >The US supreme court has struck down a lower court ruling in the case of Murthy v Missouri, finding that the government’s communications with social media platforms about Covid-19 misinformation did not violate the first amendment. The court’s decision permits the government to call on tech companies to remove falsehoods and establishes boundaries around free speech online. [Archive](https://archive.today/UuShn)

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

So a government can be aware they are 100% incorrect, yet when they blatantly violate a citizens God given right to free speech, even when that person is correct, the Supreme Court said it's ok because the government said the word "misinformation"? Did it occur to them that THE GOVERNMENT IS THE SOURCE OF THE MISINFORMATION. How in the fuck do you arrive at such a retarded conclusion ?

If they didn't rule due to "lack of standing"....lol. I mean what the fuck would a person with standing look like? traitorous cunts with no spine. So the citizens of the country some fucking how lack standing when it comes to Free Speech and clearly fraudulent elections?

hard not to be blackpilled by this. there is no institution left worth saving.