It's neither constitutional nor unconstitutional. The notion itself is irrelevant *because they're not citizens*. A non-citizen has *zero* rights, and *zero* entitlements, to consider with regard to the Constitution. The judge decided this on the wrong premises... >obama appointee ... which he did intentionally. He's willfully conflating rights with entitlements, to give to the jew who argued this whag he wants. Like every other kike-loving law nigger.