lol I work construction and I still want reparations
business access, excess gasoline from detours or traffic, all manner of externalities you list...
An ancap would argue that performance of work under government contract permits more externalities to exist, and exist uncured, than the private contractor would cause or face alone.
Anyway, this wasn't a post about theory. This was a post about actual case law that had granted relief.
The EIA is a fairly limiting view of "impacts". I've read through big ones and they're a joke and meant to cover the government's and contractor's ass, not mitigate impacts to the public, who have a token input to the documents (what a joke!).
Court cases, that's what I'm after - where judges or juries have determined, as just one possibility, that the EIA was corrupt (most are).
(something tells me you're in a bad mood today... you keep missing what I'm after)
(post is archived)