The state is not allowed to ignore what the state knows. If they have exonerating evidence they must present it.
The state is not allowed to ignore what the state knows. If they have exonerating evidence they *must* present it.
Archive: https://archive.today/HMpJv
From the post: "The decision by the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District came after a journalist sought access to videos created by Chula Vista Police Department’s “Drones as First Responders” (DFR) program. The police department is the first law enforcement agency in the country to use drones to respond to emergency calls, and several other agencies across the U.S. have since adopted similar models."
Archive: https://archive.today/HMpJv
From the post:
"The decision by the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District came after a journalist sought access to videos created by Chula Vista Police Department’s “Drones as First Responders” (DFR) program. The police department is the first law enforcement agency in the country to use drones to respond to emergency calls, and several other agencies across the U.S. have since adopted similar models."
Whoever advocated otherwise should meet a word chipper, at night, in a back ally.
Whoever advocated otherwise should meet a word chipper, at night, in a back ally.
(post is archived)