My point was that the author can't simply claim that it was false as there is no evidence to prove it false. They use the same argument to refute that it is true because there is not evidence beyond a photo, but then they suspend this logic to claim that it is false. This is classic gaslighting.
My point was that the author can't simply claim that it was false as there is no evidence to prove it false. They use the same argument to refute that it is true because there is not evidence beyond a photo, but then they suspend this logic to claim that it is false. This is classic gaslighting.
(post is archived)