Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

814

Everything happening in/around the courtroom of Judge Engoron in New York City has been ridiculous in the extreme.

Even left leaning pundits and political commentators have begun to retreat from the fevered pace of the NY civil case because they can see the appeals court intervening. . .

Source Article (theconservativetreehouse.com)

>Everything happening in/around the courtroom of Judge Engoron in New York City has been ridiculous in the extreme. >Even left leaning pundits and political commentators have begun to retreat from the fevered pace of the NY civil case because they can see the appeals court intervening. . . [Source Article](https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/11/16/new-york-appellate-judge-stops-ridiculous-new-york-gag-order-of-president-trump/#more-253050)

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

The article pretends to support Trump, but tries to establish that Trump's statement was false. There is no proof the statement is false. There is in fact a picture of Greenfield and Schumer together. The preponderance of this evidence would be that yes in fact they do have some kind of relationship. Here is the quote.

""Schumer's girlfriend, Alison R. Greenfield, is running this case against me. How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately!!" he wrote. Despite his claim, there is no evidence of a relationship between Schumer and Greenfield beyond taking a photo together at one point."

Liberals lie with impunity.

[–] • 0 pt

Is there any hard evidence beyond the picture with Schumer? The constant notes and whispers between the clerk and Engoron are sus, who is messaging Engoron via the clerk? But no hard proof of what we, and Trump suspect is really going on - yet. Maybe Trump has the proof, just has not revealed it yet.

[–] • 1 pt

My point was that the author can't simply claim that it was false as there is no evidence to prove it false. They use the same argument to refute that it is true because there is not evidence beyond a photo, but then they suspend this logic to claim that it is false. This is classic gaslighting.