“For purposes of this motion, all well-plead allegations must be taken as true, and all reasonable inferences therefrom must be drawn in the SEC’s favor.”
So if I make a well-plead allegation why this judge raped Harry Potter, the allegation must be taken as true, and all reasonable inferences therefrom must be drawn in Interpol's favor? That's literally this globohomo's argument - even patently absurd arguments like raping a fictional character must be guilty until proven innocent so long as your pleading is sufficiently verbose.
>“For purposes of this motion, all well-plead allegations must be taken as true, and all reasonable inferences therefrom must be drawn in the SEC’s favor.”
So if I make a well-plead allegation why this judge raped Harry Potter, the allegation must be taken as true, and all reasonable inferences therefrom must be drawn in Interpol's favor? That's literally this globohomo's argument - even patently absurd arguments like raping a fictional character must be guilty until proven innocent so long as your pleading is sufficiently verbose.
Anyone guess who likes to engage in excess verbosity?
Anyone guess who likes to engage in excess verbosity?
(post is archived)