WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

930

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Margaret Thatcher, Cleopatra, Joan of Arc, Wu Zetian are the only ones I can think of.

[–] 1 pt

Nope, maybe you are too young, but I remember this bitch.... Xhe ruin UK. for good... Cleopatra? Don't be funny, she fuck Egypt forever with her chicken brain.... oh man, waman and politics. Joan of Arc.... he, he, you believe in Santa, right? btw. she was not really leader, more like propaganda puppet used and abused by both sides. But she look nice in history fantasy tales. Honestly, I'm not 'expert' for Wu Zetian... but Chinese and Japanese have history of female glorification without reason than to make some kind of romantic myth,, or something like that. Y'know Thatcher, Cleopatra, Catherine the Great, etc. on first sight look as great, wise, beneficial rulers. But when you scratch under surface you find that his actions make great, sometime irreversible damage to country. Think about Obama... on first sight he look as ...... casual US. president, he on surface don't fuck US. more than his predecessors.
Reality are that he under his authority start big US. fall... all this woke madness, shadow government, media corruption, infestation of military, agencies, police.. with leftards, etc. All this are his achievement. This are reason why I think that female are not mentally suitable for ANY position of authority.

[–] 1 pt

I had to dig deep to come up with those, really says something.

[–] 1 pt

It's much easier to connect Obama with current shit in US. simply because we live in this time. For history figures you must look around, search for "indirect" information's. All in all History is more 'art' that objective science. Bucket full of lies, deceptions, misconceptions and other shit. For god sake we actually don't know in which year we actually live... better to say in which century we live... are this 21 century or 19 or 18 century?