jewish Weimar 2.0 [766x835 - 588KB] | Poal: Say what you want.

[–] • 0 pt

Throughout history, all civilizations had all major religions have condemned homosexuality. [1] In the American colonies, homosexual acts were a capital offense. Thomas Jefferson said that homosexuality “should be punished: if a man, by castration; if a woman, by cutting through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one-half inch in diameter as least.” [2] Until 1961, homosexual acts were illegal throughout America. Gays claim that the “prevailing attitude toward homosexuals in the US and many other countries is revulsion and hostility… for acts and desires not harmful to anyone.” [3] The American Psychological Association and the American Public Health Association assured the US Supreme Court in 1986 that “no significant data show that engaging in… oral and anal sex, results in mental or physical dysfunction.” [4] The major surveys on homosexual behavior are summarized below. Two things stand out: 1) homosexuals behave similarly world-over, and 2) as Harvard Medical Professor Dr. William Haseltine [33] noted in 1993, the “changes in sexual behavior that have been reported to have occurred in some groups have proved, for the most part, to be transient. For example, bath houses and sex clubs in many cities have either reopened or were never closed.”

ORAL “SEX”: Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human blood, with all its medical risks. Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and often will have been in unsanitary places, such as a rectum), individuals so involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners [17][27]), and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1,105 different partners/year, the potential for infection is considerable.

RECTAL “SEX”: Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries, [3] gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year. Rectal sex is dangerous. During rectal intercourse, the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient’s own feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present [7]), rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread hepatitis B, HIV, syphilis, and a host of other blood-borne diseases.

Tearing or ripping of the anal wall is especially likely with “fisting,” where the hand and arm is inserted into the rectum. It is also common when “toys” are employed (homosexual lingo for objects which are inserted into the rectum–bottles, carrots, even gerbils [8]). The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such “sport” is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey’s time that he didn’t think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life.

FECAL “SEX”: About 80% of gays (see Table) admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners, and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study, [5] 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity–half regularly over 6 months. Result? The “annual incidence of hepatitis A in… homosexual men was 22%, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A.” In 1992, [26] it was noted that the proportion of London gays engaging in oral/anal sex had not declined since 1984.

While the body has defenses against fecal germs, exposure to the fecal discharge of dozens of strangers each year is extremely unhealthy. Ingestion of human waste is the major route of contracting hepatitis A and the enteric parasites collectively known as the Gay Bowel Syndrome. Consumption of feces has also been implicated in the transmission of typhoid fever, [9] herpes, and cancer. [27] About 10% of gays have eaten or played with [e.g., enemas, wallowing in] feces. The San Francisco Department of Public Health saw 75,000 patients per year, of whom 70 to 80% are homosexual men… An average of 10% of all patients and asymptomatic contacts reported… because of positive fecal samples or cultures for amoeba, giardia, and shigella infections were employed as food handlers in public establishments; almost 5% of those with hepatitis A were similarly employed. [10] In 1976, a rare airborne scarlet fever broke out among gays and just missed sweeping through San Francisco. [10] The US Centers for Disease Control reported that 29% of the hepatitis A cases in Denver, 66% in New York, 50% in San Francisco, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal and 26% in Melbourne in the first six months of 1991 were among gays. [11] A 1982 study “suggested that some transmission from the homosexual group to the general population may have occurred.” [12]

URINE “SEX”: About 10% of Kinsey’s gays reported having engaged in “golden showers” [drinking or being splashed with urine]. In the largest survey of gays ever conducted, [13] 23% admitted to urine sex. In the largest random survey of gays, 29% reported urine sex. In a San Francisco study of 655 gays [14] only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced “fisting,” 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum during the previous month.

OTHER PRACTICES: As the table indicates, a large minority of gays engage in torture for sexual fun. 25% of white gays [17] admitted to sex with boys 16 or younger as adults. In a 9-state study, [30] 33% of the 181 male, and 22% of the 18 female teachers caught molesting students did so homosexually (though less than 3% of men and 2% of women engaged in homosexuality). Depending on the study, the percent of gays reporting sex in public restrooms ranged from 14% [16] to 41% [13] to 66% [6] to 9% [16] to 60% [13] and 67% [5] reported sex in gay baths; 64% [16] and 90% [18] said that they used illegal drugs. Fear of AIDS may have reduced the volume of gay sex partners, but the numbers are prodigious by any standard. Morin [15] reported that 824 gays had lowered their sex rate from 70 partners/yr. in 1982 to 50/yr. by 1984. McKusick [14] reported declines from 76/yr. to 47/yr. in 1985. In Spain, [32] the average was 42/yr. in 1989. Death and disease accompany promiscuous and unsanitary sexual activity. 70% to 78% [13] of gays reported having had a sexually transmitted disease. The proportion with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes, amoeba) ranged from 25% [18] to 39% [19] to 59%. [20] As of 1992, 83% of US AIDS in whites had occurred in gays. [21] The Seattle sexual diary study [3] reported that gays had, on a yearly average:

fellated 108 men and swallowed semen from 48;

exchanged saliva with 96;

experienced 68 penile penetrations of the anus; and

ingested fecal material from 19.

No wonder 10% came down with hepatitis B and 7% contracted hepatitis A during the 6-month study.

Smokers and drug addicts don’t live as long as non-smokers or non-addicts, so we consider smoking and narcotics abuse harmful. The typical lifespan of homosexuals suggests that their activities are more destructive than smoking and as dangerous as drugs. Obituaries numbering 6,516 from 16 US homosexual journals over the past 12 years were compared to a large sample of obituaries from regular newspapers. [23] The obituaries from the regular newspapers were similar to US averages for longevity; the median age of death of married men was 75, and 80% of them died old (age 65 or older). For unmarried or divorced men, the median age of death was 57, and 32% of them died old. Married women averaged age 79 at death; 85% died old. Unmarried and divorced women averaged age 71, and 60% of them died old.

The median age of death for homosexuals, however, was virtually the same nationwide–and, overall, less than 2% survived to old age. If AIDS was the cause of death, the median age was 39. For the 829 gays who died of something other than AIDS, the median age of death was 42, and 9% died old. The 163 lesbians had a median age of death of 44, and 20% died old. 2.8% of gays died violently. They were 116 times more apt to be murdered; 24 times more apt to commit suicide; and had a traffic accident death rate 18 times the rate of comparably-aged white males. Heart attacks, cancer and liver failure were exceptionally common. 20% of lesbians died of murder, suicide, or accident–a rate 487 times higher than that of white females aged 25-44. The age distribution of samples of homosexuals in the scientific literature from 1989 to 1992 suggests a similarly shortened lifespan.

Homosexuals rode into the dawn of sexual freedom and returned with a plague that gives every indication of destroying most of them. Those who treat AIDS patients are at great risk, not only from HIV infection, which as of 1992 involved over 100 health care workers, [21] but also from TB and new strains of other diseases. [24] Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk. [24] Dr. Max Essex, chair of the Harvard AIDS Institute, warned congress in 1992 that “AIDS has already led to other kinds of dangerous epidemics… if AIDS is not eliminated, other new lethal microbes will emerge, and neither safe sex nor drug free practices will prevent them.” [28] At least 8, and perhaps as many as 30 [29] patients had been infected with HIV by healthcare workers as of 1992. The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story. Imagine exchanging saliva, feces, semen and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, ingesting feces, and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis. Often these encounters occur while the participants are drunk, high, and/or in an orgy setting. Further, many of them occur in extremely unsanitary places (bathrooms, dirty peep shows), or, because homosexuals travel so frequently, in other parts of the world.

Every year, a quarter or more of homosexuals visit another country. [20] Fresh American germs get taken to Europe, Africa and Asia, and fresh pathogens from these continents come here. Foreign homosexuals regularly visit the US and participate in this biological swapmeet. Unfortunately, the danger of these exchanges does not merely affect homosexuals. Travelers carried so many tropical diseases to New York City that it had to institute a tropical disease center, and gays carried HIV from New York City to the rest of the world. [27] Most of the 6,349 Americans who got AIDS from contaminated blood as of 1992, received it from homosexuals, and most of the women in California who got AIDS through heterosexual activity got it from men who engaged in homosexual behavior. [23] The rare form of airborne scarlet fever that stalked San Francisco in 1976 also started among homosexuals. [10]

Society is legitimately concerned with health risks–they impact our taxes and everyone’s chances of illness and injury. Because we care about them, smokers are discouraged from smoking by higher insurance premiums, taxes on cigarettes and bans against smoking in public. These social pressures cause many to quit. They likewise encourage non-smokers to stay non-smokers. Homosexuals are mentally troubled people engaging in dangerous activities. Because we care about them and those tempted to join them, it is important that we neither encourage nor legitimize such a destructive lifestyle.

References 1. Karlen A. Sexuality & Homosexuality, NY Norton, 1971 2. Pines B. Back to Basics, NY Morrow, 1982, p. 211 3. Weinberg G. Society & the Healthy Homosexual, NY St. Martin’s, 1972, preface 4. Amici curiae brief, in Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986 5. Corey L. & Holmes, KK, Sexual transmission of Hepatitis A in homosexual men, New England Journal of Medicine, 1980302435- 38 6. Cameron P et. al., Sexual orientation and sexually transmitted disease, Nebraska Medical Journal, 198570292-99; Effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order "Psychological Reports," 1989, 64, 1167-79 7. Manligit, G.W. et al Chronic immune stimulation by sperm alloan- tigers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1984251 237-38 8. Cecil Adams, "The Straight Dope," The Reader (Chicago, 3/28186) [Adams writes authoritatively on counter-culture material, his column is carried in many alternative newspapers across the S and Canada] 9. Dritz, S. & Braff. Sexually transmitted typhoid fever. New England Journal of Medicine, 19772961359-60 10. Dritz, S. Medical aspects of homosexuality. New England Journal of Medicine, 19803024634 11. CDC Hepatitis A among homosexual men -United States, Canada, and Australia. MMWR 199241155-64 12. Christenson B. et al. An epidemic outbreak of hepatitis A among homosexual men in Stockholm, American Journal of Epidemiology, 1982115599-607 13. Jay, K. & Young, A. The Gay Report. NY Summit, 1979 14. McKusick, L. et al _AIDS and sexual behaviors reported by gay men in San Francisco, "American Journal of Public Health," 1985 75493- 96 15. USA Today 11/21/84 16. Gebhard, P. & Johnson, A, The Kinsey Data, NY Saunders, 1979 17. Bell, A. & Weinberg, M. Homosexualities, NY Simon & Schuster 1978 18. Jaffee, H. et al. National case-control study of Kapos?s sarcoma. "Annals Of Internal Medicine," 198399145-51 19. Quinn, T. C. et al. The polymicrobial origin of intestinal infection in homosexual men. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1983309576-82 20. Biggar R. J. Low T-lymphocyte ratios in homosexual men. "Journal Of The American Medical Association," 19842511441-46; "Wall Street Journal," 7/18/91, Bl 21. CDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance, February 1993 22. Chu, S. et al. AIDS in bisexual men in the U.S. "American Journal Of Public Health," 199282220-24 23. Cameron, P., Playfair W. & Wellum, S. The lifespan of homo- sexuals. Paper presented at Eastem Psychological Association Convention, April 17, 1993 24. Dooley, W.W. et al. No socomial transmission of tuberculosis in a hospital unit for HRLinvected patients. "Journal of the _American Medical Association," 19922672632-35 25. Schechter M.T. et al. Changes in sexual behavior and fear of AIDS. "Lancet," 198411293 26. Word, J. et al. Kaposi’s sarcoma and insertive thinning. "Lancet," 1992339938 27. Beral, V. et al. Risk of Kap o s?s sarcoma and sexual practices associated with faecal contact in homosexual or bisexual men with AIDS. "Lancet," 1992339632-35 28. Testimony before House Health & Environment Subcommittee, 2/24/92 29. Cie sielsld, C. et al. Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus in a dental practice. "Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992116 798-80; CDC Announcement Houston Post, 8/7/92 30. Rubin, S. “Sex Education Teachers Who Sexually Abuse Students.” 24th International Congress on Psychology, Sydney, Australia, August 1988. 31. Cameron, P. & Cameron, K. Prevalence of homosexuality. "Psychology Reports," 1993, in press; Melbye, M. & Biggar R.J. Interactions between persons at risk for _AIDS and the general population in Denmark. "American Journal of Epidemiology," 1992135593-602 32. Rodriguez-Pichardo, A. et al. Sexually transmitted diseases in homosexual males in Seville, Spain, "Geniourin Medicina," 1990 66;423-427 33. AIDS Prognosis, Washington Times, 2/13/93, CI.

>Throughout history, all civilizations had all major religions have condemned homosexuality. [1] In the American colonies, homosexual acts were a capital offense. Thomas Jefferson said that homosexuality “should be punished: if a man, by castration; if a woman, by cutting through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one-half inch in diameter as least.” [2] Until 1961, homosexual acts were illegal throughout America. Gays claim that the “prevailing attitude toward homosexuals in the US and many other countries is revulsion and hostility… for acts and desires not harmful to anyone.” [3] The American Psychological Association and the American Public Health Association assured the US Supreme Court in 1986 that “no significant data show that engaging in… oral and anal sex, results in mental or physical dysfunction.” [4] The major surveys on homosexual behavior are summarized below. Two things stand out: 1) homosexuals behave similarly world-over, and 2) as Harvard Medical Professor Dr. William Haseltine [33] noted in 1993, the “changes in sexual behavior that have been reported to have occurred in some groups have proved, for the most part, to be transient. For example, bath houses and sex clubs in many cities have either reopened or were never closed.” > >ORAL “SEX”: Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human blood, with all its medical risks. Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and often will have been in unsanitary places, such as a rectum), individuals so involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners [17][27]), and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1,105 different partners/year, the potential for infection is considerable. > >RECTAL “SEX”: Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries, [3] gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year. Rectal sex is dangerous. During rectal intercourse, the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient’s own feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present [7]), rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread hepatitis B, HIV, syphilis, and a host of other blood-borne diseases. > >Tearing or ripping of the anal wall is especially likely with “fisting,” where the hand and arm is inserted into the rectum. It is also common when “toys” are employed (homosexual lingo for objects which are inserted into the rectum–bottles, carrots, even gerbils [8]). The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such “sport” is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey’s time that he didn’t think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life. > >FECAL “SEX”: About 80% of gays (see Table) admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners, and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study, [5] 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity–half regularly over 6 months. Result? The “annual incidence of hepatitis A in… homosexual men was 22%, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A.” In 1992, [26] it was noted that the proportion of London gays engaging in oral/anal sex had not declined since 1984. > >While the body has defenses against fecal germs, exposure to the fecal discharge of dozens of strangers each year is extremely unhealthy. Ingestion of human waste is the major route of contracting hepatitis A and the enteric parasites collectively known as the Gay Bowel Syndrome. Consumption of feces has also been implicated in the transmission of typhoid fever, [9] herpes, and cancer. [27] About 10% of gays have eaten or played with [e.g., enemas, wallowing in] feces. The San Francisco Department of Public Health saw 75,000 patients per year, of whom 70 to 80% are homosexual men… An average of 10% of all patients and asymptomatic contacts reported… because of positive fecal samples or cultures for amoeba, giardia, and shigella infections were employed as food handlers in public establishments; almost 5% of those with hepatitis A were similarly employed. [10] In 1976, a rare airborne scarlet fever broke out among gays and just missed sweeping through San Francisco. [10] The US Centers for Disease Control reported that 29% of the hepatitis A cases in Denver, 66% in New York, 50% in San Francisco, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal and 26% in Melbourne in the first six months of 1991 were among gays. [11] A 1982 study “suggested that some transmission from the homosexual group to the general population may have occurred.” [12] > >URINE “SEX”: About 10% of Kinsey’s gays reported having engaged in “golden showers” [drinking or being splashed with urine]. In the largest survey of gays ever conducted, [13] 23% admitted to urine sex. In the largest random survey of gays, 29% reported urine sex. In a San Francisco study of 655 gays [14] only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced “fisting,” 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum during the previous month. > >OTHER PRACTICES: As the table indicates, a large minority of gays engage in torture for sexual fun. 25% of white gays [17] admitted to sex with boys 16 or younger as adults. In a 9-state study, [30] 33% of the 181 male, and 22% of the 18 female teachers caught molesting students did so homosexually (though less than 3% of men and 2% of women engaged in homosexuality). Depending on the study, the percent of gays reporting sex in public restrooms ranged from 14% [16] to 41% [13] to 66% [6] to 9% [16] to 60% [13] and 67% [5] reported sex in gay baths; 64% [16] and 90% [18] said that they used illegal drugs. Fear of AIDS may have reduced the volume of gay sex partners, but the numbers are prodigious by any standard. Morin [15] reported that 824 gays had lowered their sex rate from 70 partners/yr. in 1982 to 50/yr. by 1984. McKusick [14] reported declines from 76/yr. to 47/yr. in 1985. In Spain, [32] the average was 42/yr. in 1989. Death and disease accompany promiscuous and unsanitary sexual activity. 70% to 78% [13] of gays reported having had a sexually transmitted disease. The proportion with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes, amoeba) ranged from 25% [18] to 39% [19] to 59%. [20] As of 1992, 83% of US AIDS in whites had occurred in gays. [21] The Seattle sexual diary study [3] reported that gays had, on a yearly average: > >>1. fellated 108 men and swallowed semen from 48; >>2. exchanged saliva with 96; >>3. experienced 68 penile penetrations of the anus; and >>4. ingested fecal material from 19. > >No wonder 10% came down with hepatitis B and 7% contracted hepatitis A during the 6-month study. > >Smokers and drug addicts don’t live as long as non-smokers or non-addicts, so we consider smoking and narcotics abuse harmful. The typical lifespan of homosexuals suggests that their activities are more destructive than smoking and as dangerous as drugs. Obituaries numbering 6,516 from 16 US homosexual journals over the past 12 years were compared to a large sample of obituaries from regular newspapers. [23] The obituaries from the regular newspapers were similar to US averages for longevity; the median age of death of married men was 75, and 80% of them died old (age 65 or older). For unmarried or divorced men, the median age of death was 57, and 32% of them died old. Married women averaged age 79 at death; 85% died old. Unmarried and divorced women averaged age 71, and 60% of them died old. > >The median age of death for homosexuals, however, was virtually the same nationwide–and, overall, less than 2% survived to old age. If AIDS was the cause of death, the median age was 39. For the 829 gays who died of something other than AIDS, the median age of death was 42, and 9% died old. The 163 lesbians had a median age of death of 44, and 20% died old. 2.8% of gays died violently. They were 116 times more apt to be murdered; 24 times more apt to commit suicide; and had a traffic accident death rate 18 times the rate of comparably-aged white males. Heart attacks, cancer and liver failure were exceptionally common. 20% of lesbians died of murder, suicide, or accident–a rate 487 times higher than that of white females aged 25-44. The age distribution of samples of homosexuals in the scientific literature from 1989 to 1992 suggests a similarly shortened lifespan. > >Homosexuals rode into the dawn of sexual freedom and returned with a plague that gives every indication of destroying most of them. Those who treat AIDS patients are at great risk, not only from HIV infection, which as of 1992 involved over 100 health care workers, [21] but also from TB and new strains of other diseases. [24] Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk. [24] Dr. Max Essex, chair of the Harvard AIDS Institute, warned congress in 1992 that “AIDS has already led to other kinds of dangerous epidemics… if AIDS is not eliminated, other new lethal microbes will emerge, and neither safe sex nor drug free practices will prevent them.” [28] At least 8, and perhaps as many as 30 [29] patients had been infected with HIV by healthcare workers as of 1992. The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story. Imagine exchanging saliva, feces, semen and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, ingesting feces, and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis. Often these encounters occur while the participants are drunk, high, and/or in an orgy setting. Further, many of them occur in extremely unsanitary places (bathrooms, dirty peep shows), or, because homosexuals travel so frequently, in other parts of the world. > >Every year, a quarter or more of homosexuals visit another country. [20] Fresh American germs get taken to Europe, Africa and Asia, and fresh pathogens from these continents come here. Foreign homosexuals regularly visit the US and participate in this biological swapmeet. Unfortunately, the danger of these exchanges does not merely affect homosexuals. Travelers carried so many tropical diseases to New York City that it had to institute a tropical disease center, and gays carried HIV from New York City to the rest of the world. [27] Most of the 6,349 Americans who got AIDS from contaminated blood as of 1992, received it from homosexuals, and most of the women in California who got AIDS through heterosexual activity got it from men who engaged in homosexual behavior. [23] The rare form of airborne scarlet fever that stalked San Francisco in 1976 also started among homosexuals. [10] > >Society is legitimately concerned with health risks–they impact our taxes and everyone’s chances of illness and injury. Because we care about them, smokers are discouraged from smoking by higher insurance premiums, taxes on cigarettes and bans against smoking in public. These social pressures cause many to quit. They likewise encourage non-smokers to stay non-smokers. Homosexuals are mentally troubled people engaging in dangerous activities. Because we care about them and those tempted to join them, it is important that we neither encourage nor legitimize such a destructive lifestyle. > >>References >>1. Karlen A. Sexuality & Homosexuality, NY Norton, 1971 >>2. Pines B. Back to Basics, NY Morrow, 1982, p. 211 >>3. Weinberg G. Society & the Healthy Homosexual, NY St. Martin’s, 1972, preface >>4. Amici curiae brief, in Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986 >>5. Corey L. & Holmes, KK, Sexual transmission of Hepatitis A in homosexual men, New England Journal of Medicine, 1980302435- 38 >>6. Cameron P et. al., Sexual orientation and sexually transmitted disease, Nebraska Medical Journal, 198570292-99; Effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order "Psychological Reports," 1989, 64, 1167-79 >>7. Manligit, G.W. et al Chronic immune stimulation by sperm alloan- tigers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1984251 237-38 >>8. Cecil Adams, "The Straight Dope," The Reader (Chicago, 3/28186) [Adams writes authoritatively on counter-culture material, his column is carried in many alternative newspapers across the S and Canada] >>9. Dritz, S. & Braff. Sexually transmitted typhoid fever. New England Journal of Medicine, 19772961359-60 >>10. Dritz, S. Medical aspects of homosexuality. New England Journal of Medicine, 19803024634 >>11. CDC Hepatitis A among homosexual men -United States, Canada, and Australia. MMWR 199241155-64 >>12. Christenson B. et al. An epidemic outbreak of hepatitis A among homosexual men in Stockholm, American Journal of Epidemiology, 1982115599-607 >>13. Jay, K. & Young, A. The Gay Report. NY Summit, 1979 >>14. McKusick, L. et al _AIDS and sexual behaviors reported by gay men in San Francisco, "American Journal of Public Health," 1985 75493- 96 >>15. USA Today 11/21/84 >>16. Gebhard, P. & Johnson, A, The Kinsey Data, NY Saunders, 1979 >>17. Bell, A. & Weinberg, M. Homosexualities, NY Simon & Schuster 1978 >>18. Jaffee, H. et al. National case-control study of Kapos?s sarcoma. "Annals Of Internal Medicine," 198399145-51 >>19. Quinn, T. C. et al. The polymicrobial origin of intestinal infection in homosexual men. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1983309576-82 >>20. Biggar R. J. Low T-lymphocyte ratios in homosexual men. "Journal Of The American Medical Association," 19842511441-46; "Wall Street Journal," 7/18/91, Bl >>21. CDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance, February 1993 >>22. Chu, S. et al. AIDS in bisexual men in the U.S. "American Journal Of Public Health," 199282220-24 >>23. Cameron, P., Playfair W. & Wellum, S. The lifespan of homo- sexuals. Paper presented at Eastem Psychological Association Convention, April 17, 1993 >>24. Dooley, W.W. et al. No socomial transmission of tuberculosis in a hospital unit for HRLinvected patients. "Journal of the _American Medical Association," 19922672632-35 >>25. Schechter M.T. et al. Changes in sexual behavior and fear of AIDS. "Lancet," 198411293 >>26. Word, J. et al. Kaposi’s sarcoma and insertive thinning. "Lancet," 1992339938 >>27. Beral, V. et al. Risk of Kap o s?s sarcoma and sexual practices associated with faecal contact in homosexual or bisexual men with AIDS. "Lancet," 1992339632-35 >>28. Testimony before House Health & Environment Subcommittee, 2/24/92 >>29. Cie sielsld, C. et al. Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus in a dental practice. "Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992116 798-80; CDC Announcement Houston Post, 8/7/92 >>30. Rubin, S. “Sex Education Teachers Who Sexually Abuse Students.” 24th International Congress on Psychology, Sydney, Australia, August 1988. >>31. Cameron, P. & Cameron, K. Prevalence of homosexuality. "Psychology Reports," 1993, in press; Melbye, M. & Biggar R.J. Interactions between persons at risk for _AIDS and the general population in Denmark. "American Journal of Epidemiology," 1992135593-602 >>32. Rodriguez-Pichardo, A. et al. Sexually transmitted diseases in homosexual males in Seville, Spain, "Geniourin Medicina," 1990 66;423-427 >>33. AIDS Prognosis, Washington Times, 2/13/93, CI.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

In the United States, homosexual activists are more circumspect about their efforts to gain access to children than they are in Canada or Europe. While NAMBLA has regularly marched in homosexual pride parades in New York, San Francisco and other major cities, homosexual activists publicly disassociate themselves from pedophiles as part of a public relations strategy. Yet homosexual groups are actively recruiting gay youth through such groups as The Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League, the HettrickMartin Institute, AIDS service providers, and various agencies that assist runaways. A concerted effort to change age-of-consent laws has not yet emerged, but some ominous signs portend an eventual effort. When Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was an attorney for the ACLU, she co-authored a report recommending that the age of consent for sexual acts be lowered to 12 years of age [1] The paragraph reads as follows: “Eliminate the phrase ‘carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years’ and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense… A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person… [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old…”

The public still has a revulsion against child sexual abuse. In fact, whenever there is an attempt to show a connection between pedophiles and homosexuality, the standard response from the activists is that as many as 97% of all pedophiles are heterosexuals and/or married men. Thus, they deflect attention away from their own proclivities to have sex with children. There is some truth to the claim that many pedophiles are heterosexually oriented men. To be accurate, pedophilia is the crime of sexually molesting a child of the opposite sex. Pederasty, on the other hand, is the crime of molesting a child of the same sex. The term pedophile is used as a general term to describe a person who molests any child, and the term pedophilia, however, is commonly used to refer to child sexual abuse in general. The homosexual who molests a child of the same sex, therefore, technically is guilty of pederasty, rather than pedophilia–yet both are child sexual abuse.

Homosexuals deny that there is a high incidence of child molestation among them, but the statistics tell another story. First, we need to look at the statistics on child sexual abuse in general. The National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse (NCPCA) has published the following information:

Reports of sexual abuse are on the increase in our nation.

Between 80 and 95% of all child molestations are committed by men. The NCPCA notes, however, that there is a “dramatic increase in the number of adolescent offenders who have committed sexually aggressive acts against other children.”

Girls are more likely to be the victims of molestation than boys. Males account for 25 to 35% of child sexual abuse victims. [2]

How prevalent is child molestation among homosexuals? The Gay Report, published by homosexual researchers Jay and Young in 1979, revealed that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger. [3] Although homosexuals account for less than two percent of the population, they constitute about a third of child molesters. [4] Further, as noted by the Encino, California-based National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), “since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles, it is estimated that approximately 80% of pedophile victims are boys who have been molested by adult males. [5] A nationwide investigation of child molestation in the Boy Scouts from 1971 to 1991 revealed that more than 2,000 boys reported molestation by adult Scout leaders. (Note: The Scouts, who have 150,000 Scoutmasters and assistant Scoutmasters, ban hundreds of men each year from scouting out of concern that they might abuse boys.) [6] A study of Canadian pedophiles has shown that 30% of those studied admitted to having engaged in homosexual acts as adults, and 91% of the molesters of non-familial boys admitted to no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexual. [7]

Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and Charles B. Johnson, Ph.D., conducted a content study of the personal ads in The Advocate, the national gay and lesbian newsmagazine and discovered that “chickens,” a common term for underage boys sought for sex, were widely solicited. Many of the advertisements in the magazine solicited boys and teens from within a larger pool of prostitution ads. [8] The authors also note a statement from a book review by homosexual activist Larry Kramer that the work, “like much canonized male homosexual literature, involves sexually predatory white men on the prowl for dark-skinned boys to gratify them.” [9]

In a 1985 study of the rates of molestation among homosexual pederasts compared to heterosexual pedophiles, Dr. Paul Cameron found the following:

153 pederasts had sexually molested 22,981 boys over an average period of 22 years. 224 pedophiles had molested 4,435 girls over an average period of 18 years. The average pederast molested an average of 150 boys, and each heterosexual pedophile molested an average of 20 girls, a ratio of 7.5:1. [10]

Gaining access to children has been a long-term goal of the homosexual movement. In 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations adopted a “Gay Rights Platform” that included the following demand: “Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.” David Thorstad, a spokesman for the homosexual rights movement and NAMBLA, clearly states the objectives: “The ultimate goal of the gay liberation movement is the achievement of sexual freedom for all–not just equal rights for lesbians and gay men, but also freedom of sexual expression for young people and children.” This goal has not changed since it was articulated in 1972. [11]

Homosexual organizations around the world have embarked upon a vigorous campaign to lower actual age of consent laws by claiming that current laws are discriminatory against homosexuals. In England, for example, a major push is underway to lower the age of sexual consent for homosexuals to 14. OutRage!, [12] a homosexual organization that operates much like ACT UP in the United States, has been leading the crusade. In a statement published on the Queer Intelligence Service website, OutRage! claims that “…underage queers have rights, too. They are some of the most vulnerable members of our community. We have a special responsibility to protect their interests and welfare.” [13]

References 1. Sex Bias in the US Code, Report for the US Commission on Civil Rights, April 1977, p. 102, quoted in Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Feminist World View, The Phyllis Schlafly Report, Vol. 26, No. 12, Section 1, p. 3 2. Child Sexual Abuse, National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse, December 1996 3. K. Jay and A. Young, The Gay Report (New York, Summit Books, 1979), p. 275. 4. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 18 (Spring 1992): 3993, cited in The Problem of Pedophilia op. cit. Also. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 10, (Fall 1984): 197, cited in NARTH Fact Sheet 5. Thomas Schmidt, Straight and Narrow, Compassion and Clarity in the Homosexuality Debate (Downers Grove, 111.: Intervarsity Press), p. 114, cited in The Problem of Pedophilia, op. cit., p. 2 6. Patrick Boyle, Scout’s Honor (Rocklin, California, Prima Publishing, 1994), p. 316 7. W. L. Marsha, et al., Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 6 (1991): 323-336, cited in Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don’t Want You To See, Colorado for Family Values Report, Vol. 14, March 1994 8. Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., A Content Analysis of “The Advocate”, unpublished manuscript p. 18, quoted inPedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don’t Want You To See, ibid. 9. From Lany Kramer’s Reading List, The Advocate, January 24, 1995, p. 99, cited in Status Report, The Reisman & Johnson Report of Partner Solicitation Characteristics as a Reflection of More Sexual Orientation and the Threat to Children, First Principles Press, January 1995 10. Dr. Paul Cameron, Homosexual Molestation of Children/Sexual Interaction of Teacher and Pupil, Psychological Reports 57 (1985): 1227-1236 11. Enrique T. Rueda, The Homosexual Network (Old Greenwhich, Connecticut: The Devin Adair Company, 1982), p. 201 12. Peter Tatchell, Why We Want an Age of Consent of 14, Queer Intelligence Service, Agenda for Gay Law Reform, OutRage.!, London, Sept. 10, 1998 13. Frank V. York and Robert H. Knight, Homosexual Activists Work To Normalize Sex With Boys

>In the United States, homosexual activists are more circumspect about their efforts to gain access to children than they are in Canada or Europe. While NAMBLA has regularly marched in homosexual pride parades in New York, San Francisco and other major cities, homosexual activists publicly disassociate themselves from pedophiles as part of a public relations strategy. Yet homosexual groups are actively recruiting gay youth through such groups as The Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League, the HettrickMartin Institute, AIDS service providers, and various agencies that assist runaways. A concerted effort to change age-of-consent laws has not yet emerged, but some ominous signs portend an eventual effort. When Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was an attorney for the ACLU, she co-authored a report recommending that the age of consent for sexual acts be lowered to 12 years of age [1] The paragraph reads as follows: “Eliminate the phrase ‘carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years’ and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense… A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person… [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old…” > >The public still has a revulsion against child sexual abuse. In fact, whenever there is an attempt to show a connection between pedophiles and homosexuality, the standard response from the activists is that as many as 97% of all pedophiles are heterosexuals and/or married men. Thus, they deflect attention away from their own proclivities to have sex with children. There is some truth to the claim that many pedophiles are heterosexually oriented men. To be accurate, pedophilia is the crime of sexually molesting a child of the opposite sex. Pederasty, on the other hand, is the crime of molesting a child of the same sex. The term pedophile is used as a general term to describe a person who molests any child, and the term pedophilia, however, is commonly used to refer to child sexual abuse in general. The homosexual who molests a child of the same sex, therefore, technically is guilty of pederasty, rather than pedophilia–yet both are child sexual abuse. > >Homosexuals deny that there is a high incidence of child molestation among them, but the statistics tell another story. First, we need to look at the statistics on child sexual abuse in general. The National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse (NCPCA) has published the following information: >>1. Reports of sexual abuse are on the increase in our nation. >>2. Between 80 and 95% of all child molestations are committed by men. The NCPCA notes, however, that there is a “dramatic increase in the number of adolescent offenders who have committed sexually aggressive acts against other children.” >>3. Girls are more likely to be the victims of molestation than boys. Males account for 25 to 35% of child sexual abuse victims. [2] > >How prevalent is child molestation among homosexuals? >The Gay Report, published by homosexual researchers Jay and Young in 1979, revealed that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger. [3] Although homosexuals account for less than two percent of the population, they constitute about a third of child molesters. [4] Further, as noted by the Encino, California-based National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), “since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles, it is estimated that approximately 80% of pedophile victims are boys who have been molested by adult males. [5] A nationwide investigation of child molestation in the Boy Scouts from 1971 to 1991 revealed that more than 2,000 boys reported molestation by adult Scout leaders. (Note: The Scouts, who have 150,000 Scoutmasters and assistant Scoutmasters, ban hundreds of men each year from scouting out of concern that they might abuse boys.) [6] A study of Canadian pedophiles has shown that 30% of those studied admitted to having engaged in homosexual acts as adults, and 91% of the molesters of non-familial boys admitted to no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexual. [7] > >Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and Charles B. Johnson, Ph.D., conducted a content study of the personal ads in The Advocate, the national gay and lesbian newsmagazine and discovered that “chickens,” a common term for underage boys sought for sex, were widely solicited. Many of the advertisements in the magazine solicited boys and teens from within a larger pool of prostitution ads. [8] The authors also note a statement from a book review by homosexual activist Larry Kramer that the work, “like much canonized male homosexual literature, involves sexually predatory white men on the prowl for dark-skinned boys to gratify them.” [9] > >In a 1985 study of the rates of molestation among homosexual pederasts compared to heterosexual pedophiles, Dr. Paul Cameron found the following: >>153 pederasts had sexually molested 22,981 boys over an average period of 22 years. >>224 pedophiles had molested 4,435 girls over an average period of 18 years. >>The average pederast molested an average of 150 boys, and each heterosexual pedophile molested an average of 20 girls, a ratio of 7.5:1. [10] > >Gaining access to children has been a long-term goal of the homosexual movement. In 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations adopted a “Gay Rights Platform” that included the following demand: “Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.” David Thorstad, a spokesman for the homosexual rights movement and NAMBLA, clearly states the objectives: “The ultimate goal of the gay liberation movement is the achievement of sexual freedom for all–not just equal rights for lesbians and gay men, but also freedom of sexual expression for young people and children.” This goal has not changed since it was articulated in 1972. [11] > >Homosexual organizations around the world have embarked upon a vigorous campaign to lower actual age of consent laws by claiming that current laws are discriminatory against homosexuals. In England, for example, a major push is underway to lower the age of sexual consent for homosexuals to 14. OutRage!, [12] a homosexual organization that operates much like ACT UP in the United States, has been leading the crusade. In a statement published on the Queer Intelligence Service website, OutRage! claims that “…underage queers have rights, too. They are some of the most vulnerable members of our community. We have a special responsibility to protect their interests and welfare.” [13] > >>References >>1. Sex Bias in the US Code, Report for the US Commission on Civil Rights, April 1977, p. 102, quoted in Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Feminist World View, The Phyllis Schlafly Report, Vol. 26, No. 12, Section 1, p. 3 >>2. Child Sexual Abuse, National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse, December 1996 >>3. K. Jay and A. Young, The Gay Report (New York, Summit Books, 1979), p. 275. >>4. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 18 (Spring 1992): 3993, cited in The Problem of Pedophilia op. cit. Also. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 10, (Fall 1984): 197, cited in NARTH Fact Sheet >>5. Thomas Schmidt, Straight and Narrow, Compassion and Clarity in the Homosexuality Debate (Downers Grove, 111.: Intervarsity Press), p. 114, cited in The Problem of Pedophilia, op. cit., p. 2 >>6. Patrick Boyle, Scout’s Honor (Rocklin, California, Prima Publishing, 1994), p. 316 >>7. W. L. Marsha, et al., Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 6 (1991): 323-336, cited in Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don’t Want You To See, Colorado for Family Values Report, Vol. 14, March 1994 >>8. Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., A Content Analysis of “The Advocate”, unpublished manuscript p. 18, quoted inPedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don’t Want You To See, ibid. >>9. From Lany Kramer’s Reading List, The Advocate, January 24, 1995, p. 99, cited in Status Report, The Reisman & Johnson Report of Partner Solicitation Characteristics as a Reflection of More Sexual Orientation and the Threat to Children, First Principles Press, January 1995 >>10. Dr. Paul Cameron, Homosexual Molestation of Children/Sexual Interaction of Teacher and Pupil, Psychological Reports 57 (1985): 1227-1236 >>11. Enrique T. Rueda, The Homosexual Network (Old Greenwhich, Connecticut: The Devin Adair Company, 1982), p. 201 >>12. Peter Tatchell, Why We Want an Age of Consent of 14, Queer Intelligence Service, Agenda for Gay Law Reform, OutRage.!, London, Sept. 10, 1998 >>13. Frank V. York and Robert H. Knight, Homosexual Activists Work To Normalize Sex With Boys

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Katy Faust, Dawn Stefanowicz, B.N. Klein, and Robert Oscar Lopez who were all raised by homosexual parents, each submitted briefs to the 5th Circuit opposing the legalization of faggot “marriage”. Recounting childhood memories of households made deeply dysfunctional by their parents’ sexual appetites and the radical subculture that went along with their “gay” identities, all four argued that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples will likely lead to the exploitation and abuse of countless children for political and personal gain.

“While I do not believe all gays would be de facto bad parents, I know that the gay community has never in my lifetime put children first as anything other than a piece of property, a past mistake, or a political tool to be dressed up and taken out as part of a dog-and-pony show to impress the well-meaning,” Klein wrote. She added that as a child of a lesbian mother, she was pressured to pay “constant homage and attention” to her mother’s gay identity, taught that some Jews and most Christians were stupid and hated gays and were violent,” and told that homosexuals were “much more creative and artistic because they were not repressed and were naturally more ‘feeling’.”

While Klein classified her upbringing as abusive, Robert Oscar Lopez told the court that his own childhood upbringing by his mother and her longtime partner represented the “best possible conditions for a child raised by a same-sex couple.” Even so, Lopez testified that the lack of a father figure in his life combined with the influence of the radical gay culture in which he was raised gave rise to a devastating confusion about his own sexuality and ultimately led to his becoming a homosexual prostitute in his teen years in order to fulfill his craving for acceptance and love from older men.

“I experienced a great deal of sexual confusion,” Lopez wrote. “I had an inexplicable compulsion to have sex with older males… and wanted to have sex with older men who were my father’s age, though at the time I could scarcely understand what I was doing.”

Lopez said that he has spoken to dozens of other adult children of homosexuals, and that many of them have similar stories of pain and damage inflicted by the absence of a biological parent and the unwanted “step-parent” type relationship demanded by their homosexual parents’ lovers. Lopez included testimonies from nine of them in his brief, but said there were many more who were afraid to speak out for fear that the homosexual lobby would target them for harassment like they have Lopez himself.

“When we institutionalize same-sex “marriage”… we move from permitting citizens the freedom to live as they choose to promoting same-sex-headed households,” Faust wrote. “Now we are normalizing a family structure where a child will always be deprived daily of one gender influence and the relationship with at least one natural parent. Our cultural narrative becomes one that, in essence, tells children that they have no right to the natural family structure or their biological parents, but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires.”

The special-interest faggot groups and so-called support groups for kids sometimes act, or function, as fronts for a far darker side that silences, intimidates, and threatens the children who want to share the truth, allowing only a politically-correct version of our childhoods to be heard,” Stefanowicz continued. “These special-interest groups support political and legal objectives toward same-sex “marriage,” ignoring the horrendous inequality, permanent losses and prejudice to children in the name of adult sexual rights. Children lose forever their rights to know and be raised by their married biological father and mother.”

A Child Abuse and Neglect study found that 59 percent of male child sex offenders had been “victim of contact sexual abuse as a child.” 75. Elliott, p. 582. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213495000173 https://web.archive.org/web/20190610150948/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0145213495000173 https://archive.today/ir8Ag

In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300 https://web.archive.org/web/20091218104546/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300 https://archive.today/B5ZO3

>Katy Faust, Dawn Stefanowicz, B.N. Klein, and Robert Oscar Lopez who were all raised by homosexual parents, each submitted briefs to the 5th Circuit opposing the legalization of faggot “marriage”. Recounting childhood memories of households made deeply dysfunctional by their parents’ sexual appetites and the radical subculture that went along with their “gay” identities, all four argued that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples will likely lead to the exploitation and abuse of countless children for political and personal gain. > >“While I do not believe all gays would be de facto bad parents, I know that the gay community has never in my lifetime put children first as anything other than a piece of property, a past mistake, or a political tool to be dressed up and taken out as part of a dog-and-pony show to impress the well-meaning,” Klein wrote. She added that as a child of a lesbian mother, she was pressured to pay “constant homage and attention” to her mother’s gay identity, taught that some Jews and most Christians were stupid and hated gays and were violent,” and told that homosexuals were “much more creative and artistic because they were not repressed and were naturally more ‘feeling’.” > >While Klein classified her upbringing as abusive, Robert Oscar Lopez told the court that his own childhood upbringing by his mother and her longtime partner represented the “best possible conditions for a child raised by a same-sex couple.” Even so, Lopez testified that the lack of a father figure in his life combined with the influence of the radical gay culture in which he was raised gave rise to a devastating confusion about his own sexuality and ultimately led to his becoming a homosexual prostitute in his teen years in order to fulfill his craving for acceptance and love from older men. > >“I experienced a great deal of sexual confusion,” Lopez wrote. “I had an inexplicable compulsion to have sex with older males… and wanted to have sex with older men who were my father’s age, though at the time I could scarcely understand what I was doing.” > >Lopez said that he has spoken to dozens of other adult children of homosexuals, and that many of them have similar stories of pain and damage inflicted by the absence of a biological parent and the unwanted “step-parent” type relationship demanded by their homosexual parents’ lovers. Lopez included testimonies from nine of them in his brief, but said there were many more who were afraid to speak out for fear that the homosexual lobby would target them for harassment like they have Lopez himself. > >“When we institutionalize same-sex “marriage”… we move from permitting citizens the freedom to live as they choose to promoting same-sex-headed households,” Faust wrote. “Now we are normalizing a family structure where a child will always be deprived daily of one gender influence and the relationship with at least one natural parent. Our cultural narrative becomes one that, in essence, tells children that they have no right to the natural family structure or their biological parents, but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires.” > >The special-interest faggot groups and so-called support groups for kids sometimes act, or function, as fronts for a far darker side that silences, intimidates, and threatens the children who want to share the truth, allowing only a politically-correct version of our childhoods to be heard,” Stefanowicz continued. “These special-interest groups support political and legal objectives toward same-sex “marriage,” ignoring the horrendous inequality, permanent losses and prejudice to children in the name of adult sexual rights. Children lose forever their rights to know and be raised by their married biological father and mother.” > >--- >A Child Abuse and Neglect study found that 59 percent of male child sex offenders had been “victim of contact sexual abuse as a child.” 75. Elliott, p. 582. >http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213495000173 >https://web.archive.org/web/20190610150948/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0145213495000173 >https://archive.today/ir8Ag > >In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. >http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300 >https://web.archive.org/web/20091218104546/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300 >https://archive.today/B5ZO3

parent
link