Its all the age old question : "Nurture or Nature?" Was it environmental or was it inherent? I personally have always believed that homosexuality is a natural population control mechanism since it is non-reproductive. It would be likely that in this context then, that a chemical or something becomes more or less prevalent that could predispose one towards homosexuality - like you said, turn the frogs gay. And yes, if this all is true, they would most DEFINITELY use it as a population control method. Thats just the "nature" part. the "Nurture" is the porn brain, the fetishizing, the propaganda (Rainbow Mafia, sex sells, BBC race mixing for Whites, etc) and all the kike nonsense.