I shouldn't need to source you that 'gender' isn't applicable to anything outside of linguistics. It's a term that applies to words that have "characteristics of one or the other sex", but words don't have sex, they aren't biological. So words have gender. Humans do not have gender, can not have gender, have never had gender and will never have gender.
it says it's normal to have both be the same...
Nope. Because that's not normal as gender doesn't apply to biology or sexuality. Stop arguing for judaism. That's what this paper is, it's to shift the overton window left and to condition language in doing so.
You like criticizing everything but don't offer up any solutions or papers of your own that people can reference.
Correct. Because I shouldn't need to source anything for you or anybody to understand that 'gender' doesn't fucking exist in humans. It's not a thing.
No it's not. It's pushing back against this headlong rush to normalize transgendered people. What are other research papers someone can use when discussing this with normies. I'm not trying to validate jewish trick.
I'm not trying to validate jewish trick.
Yet you are.
No it's not. It's pushing back against this headlong rush to normalize transgendered people.
It is not pushing against troons. It's cementing the lie that is gender into people's minds. It's the same exact methodology used to push faggots into everything.
Well (((studies))) (you right now) say that gays just want to marry and what they do in their bedroom is none of my business!!!
It's a slow (not really) push but any little thing that pushes a form of judaism in anyway is not "pushing back against". I'll repeat this again because you choose to ignore it for some reason but gender doesn't apply to biology or sexuality, it exists in linguistics and that's it. You can't see the nuance here (there really isn't any nuance it's extremely obvious but w/e), which is sad as fuck, or you're intentionally lying and trying to subvert.
gender is not applicable to living things
e; You're intentionally ignoring (((john money))) and the (((wiemar))) and all of the judaism they pushed that you're pushing now, the horrible things that they did to innocent children of mere infancy. Why are you ignoring these things because this (((article))) totally pushes back against troons? You're like the (((republican))) who thinks the troon blair white is awesome because he's totally a 'conservative' (sic: republican) tranny. You're like the (((republican))) who thinks the nigger dave chappelle is awesome because he's totally an awesome comedian and hates troons because he's a baste (((muslim)))! You're like the (((republican))) who thinks the kike dave rubin is awesome because he's totally a 'conservative' (sic: republican) anti-commie internet personality.
Ok. Give me some research papers then that conform to the parameters you set and I can use when talking to normies and people who don't understand that "transgendered" people need mental help to overcome whatever confusion, programming, or whatever is plaguing them.
I'm just looking for something to use to discuss the issue with normies. They aren't going to snap out of it just by finding out John money was a sick and twisted jew.
(post is archived)