>>Fags are snappy dressers who spend a fortune at their hairdressers and couturiers. These things are just filthy, ragged, parasite-infested degenerates, so I wouldn't put molesting children past them. Just get real here, this above is not, like not at all. It's made up narrative straight out of your ass for the sake of conveniency. >>Thing about fags is that for them, sexual activity has no bearing on reproduction and raising a family, they just see sex as a kind of recreation devoid of any deeper significance, like playing ping-pong or eating candy, and so they treat it lightly. They don't see a problem with marching virtually naked in sexually suggestive dress in the presence of children, and by the same token, they don't see sexual activity with children as being so bad. After all, it is just another form of play. There is a serious, undeniable, pedophile problem in the homosexual population. Yes, and at the same time you have heterosexual pedos specifically targeting little girls, not boys. And you have the pedo murderer, that's yet another level of fucked up. And on top of that, you have the "pedo guild" relentlessly trying to hijack the "gay rights" stuff to further their agenda since pretty much its inception, "alternative sexualities" being the typical folding screen https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/looking-back-great-british-paedophile-infiltration-campaign-1970s-9155610.html