I'd draw the line at the baking part, The US Supreme Ct. gave one baker the right to refuse gay wedding cakes based on religion. Forcing people to use their labor is slavery. If gays want a cake with a gay message the baker should be allowed to refuse based on labor arguments alone, but seems to only have protection if they can tie it to religion somehow.
It's the same guy. These mentally ill sex perverts ordered the cake and specifically mentioned the reason in the order on the very same day that he won the previous court case.
Then baker should outsource the job to a traditional Mexican baker who likes to use dark blue, dark purple, dark red, bright yellow and bright orange coloring . Let them have a very colored decorated cake but don't make the baker have to provide his labor, baker should be able to refuse slavery.
Look at the timing. The tranny made the order the same day that he won the last suit about the dyke cake. Why this isn't being thrown out based on the previous ruling is mind boggling.
(post is archived)