The contrarian POV is: Why can't he just treat a business like a business and not look up from the order form? Or else you get cashiers who won;t ring up pork sales.
I'd draw the line at the baking part, The US Supreme Ct. gave one baker the right to refuse gay wedding cakes based on religion. Forcing people to use their labor is slavery. If gays want a cake with a gay message the baker should be allowed to refuse based on labor arguments alone, but seems to only have protection if they can tie it to religion somehow.
It's the same guy. These mentally ill sex perverts ordered the cake and specifically mentioned the reason in the order on the very same day that he won the previous court case.
Then baker should outsource the job to a traditional Mexican baker who likes to use dark blue, dark purple, dark red, bright yellow and bright orange coloring . Let them have a very colored decorated cake but don't make the baker have to provide his labor, baker should be able to refuse slavery.
you get cashiers who won;t ring up pork sales.
Don't hire mudbloods.
If that's the way it should be, then payment processors, social media companies, T-shirt makers, printing companies, web hosting services, banks, the IRS and all the other businesses who denied or canceled people for trying to make a business transaction that those companies didn't like the content of should do the same. Why is it okay for a T-shirt printing company to deny a sales transaction to a person wanting to buy T-shirts printed with "it's okay to be White" but this baker must not deny a sales transaction to someone wanting a cake with content that the baking business doesn't like? One standard for all or no standards for all. We can't have it be okay to deny for some and forced to do so for others. This is the liberal double standard at work yet again.
(post is archived)