WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

843

(post is archived)

[–] 26 pts

No one I know in either the military or law enforcement was ever trained to shoot to wound. She's either lying or lying.

[–] 8 pts

She

[–] 5 pts

Can confirm. All branches of the US military train for "shoot to kill". Same with police. Shooting to wound is retarded, because the goal of a fight is to WIN as quickly as possible.

Shooting to wound gives your opponent the opportunity to return fire. Men have taken dozens of bullets and still gone on to shoot and kill multiple people.

With hundreds of years of data, it has been determined by professionals worldwide, that the only reasonable way to end a fight is to shoot someone in the good ol' center mass. It's the biggest target, it moves the least, and if you strike the chest, most of the time the fucker is gonna go down.

Here's a video of a cop being hit in the head with a pipe, TWICE, as he's blasting a nigger running up a flight of stairs. The nigger caught at least 1-2 bullets to the torso before he almost killed the cop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMO7HxGnCgo&t=289s (skip to 3:30 to get to the shooting, if you don't want to watch the Somalian nigger chimping out).

If those cops had been "shooting to wound", like at the legs or arms of that nigger, that cop would've been killed. People just don't understand the reality of combat, either because they lack the intelligence/imagination (I believe those two are strongly linked) or the actual experience. This bitch, from the Navy, is talking about shooting to wound? Yeah, let's go to fucking sailors for advice about shootouts, they see them very often aboard their ships.

Maybe we've developed this training, and these principles, BECAUSE THEY FUCKING WORK. And here comes Miss Sally Squid, washing up on shore to tell actual warriors how to do their job. Shut up, whore- isn't there some paperwork you should be dealing with? Leave the fighting to men.

[–] 3 pts

People Women just don't understand the reality of combat

Ftfy

[–] 0 pt

This bitch, from the Navy, is talking about shooting to wound?

Too ugly to be even a liberal bitch. It's definitely a bastard, not a bitch. Look at the tranny flag in its profile.

[–] 4 pts

So, the navy trained this dyke in a time of war to only wound her enemy?

To just wound that same enemy who’d be actively aiming for her brainless skull?

And she not only listened to this horrible advice, but she’s repeating it/encouraging others to join her in getting their woke asses zapped?

LMAO.

When I need advice on how to dye my flat top purple, I might listen to this slag.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

we shoot for center mass.

We dont shoot to kill, or to wound, we shoot to make you STOP that shit we told you to stop.

She's 100% lying about the legs, no one even says that and would be reprimanded if they did.

protip: when we say STOP, its pretty much agreed upon that we mean -> u dead

[–] 1 pt

Yea, I was Navy (regular fleet) and we were trained that warning shots were for special occasions to be used against other vessels. If you shoot at a person, you are shooting the person. That's it. You shoot them and try to hit them.

[–] 7 pts (edited )

Shoot to wound is because it takes 3 people out, the wounded and the 2 to carry him....not because of some bullshit morality, and ithey don't do it purposefully, some of the weapons were designed to wound.

[–] 7 pts

That just means once you hit the target and they go down, move onto the next target, don't continue shooting the injured enemy laying on the ground. And you still aim for center of mass.

[–] 4 pts

THIS. This is what is meant by "shoot to wound", it doesn't mean you're not aiming at the fucker and trying to strike him in the most vital spot possible- you need to put him down before he can shoot you. If you hit him in the head or heart or something and it kills him immediately, great- onto the next target. But if he flops down, dropping his weapon and starts screaming in agony- there is no reason to continue shooting him unless he grabs his weapon again (a wounded man can still shoot you dead no problem).

Also, this isn't taught in US military. This is guerilla warfare, where a smaller force with less resources is engaging an opposing force who greatly outnumbers/outguns/has more resources. The Viet Cong were fantastic at this. Wounding one GI meant 2 guys gotta carry his ass away, and then he becomes a drain of resources- money and time is spent trying to keep that wounded soldier alive and get him to recover. Those resources are not being directed at destroying the VC. That's the context where "shoot to wound" matters.

[–] 1 pt

Wounding the enemy is military doctrine employed by many militaries including the US but it's related to the cartridge (bullet), not marksman training. A few fancy European militaries even designed and use their own proprietary 5.56 to tumble less terminally hence, be less lethal.

[–] 6 pts

What military was that, the Lollipop League?

[–] 3 pts

Is that the transition between the Lollipop Guild and the Lullaby League?

[–] 2 pts

Them flying monkeys fucked my head up.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Those flying monkeys were objectively creepy as fuck.

[–] [deleted] 6 pts

Lol what a lying cunt, boot camp- aim for center mass, advanced CQB- 2 in the chest 1 in the head. No silhouette I ever shot at in the military had arms or legs.

[–] 2 pts

No silhouette I ever shot at in the military had arms or legs.

That's the Skinnerian training method. "Human shape pops up- shoot it in chest, be praised. Repeat until instinctive." This was adopted a little after WW2, as researchers were trying to understand and get rid of "trigger finger frostbite". See, up until the Skinnerian method, soldiers very rarely shot to kill. They were trained to shoot to kill. But when they actually saw another person, and they were meant to shoot them- they can't do it. They subconsciously sabotage their shot. Or they put their weapon down, pick up a rock and throw it at the enemy.

Here's a great video about shooting to kill that goes into more depth about what I mentioned above: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zViyZGmBhvs

[–] 5 pts

surely they are aware that every single person who has ever served knows this is total bullshit?..

[–] 5 pts

Not a military man myself, but I hear they train to aim for center mass, plain and simple. Having been on a range myself I can say that to "just shoot the legs" would not be so easy, especially if people are moving around fast.

[–] 5 pts

The girl in pink was standing there, the fat groid with the knife charged the girl in pink. There is no amount of twisting they can do to say the fat dead cunt was protecting her self by charging people with a knife right in front of cops.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Hahahahahahaha. No. Center mass. That's how they're trained to shoot.

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Military shoot to wound.

Uh no.

Man, I'm going to lay here doing recon for 15 hours, then when that delegate shows up I'm gonna wound that one guy with a shot to the kneecap!

Edit - fucking autocorrect

[–] 3 pts

In about 500,000 rounds you may be good enough to aim for a leg. Until then you will miss and shoot an innocent and die from the knife in your heart.

Load more (12 replies)