Don't know. Read many books, but honestly this all are mess. History isn't science, something which deal with facts. It's more like "compromise", where facts are scarified because... different interests. Then remember how jews are able to corrupt and influence people. No matter is some historian Jesuit or secular scholar, they all are prone to corruption or "mistakes". My point is that we these days talk about nations in ancient times like they are thing in these times. People these days don't have same mindset as we these days. Simits, Israelites, yada, yada, all have full mouth of names. I guess that they all are same, or almost same. Consider that number of people these days was much, much, much smaller than these days. Distance of dozen kilometers or miles was enormous for these people. Majority never travel further than couple km from his home. So how someone imagine that they can have awareness of nationality. Also, considering such small number these days it's hilarious to assume that there are so many "nations". And every "nation" has his own legacy, genetic pool, identity. Like every couple thousand people. Entire population of Earth in this time was just couple millions. "Diversity" was much smaller these days. I see that in middle east was more or less maybe two "variants". No matter how much jews and other try to prove how they are Unique, this don't have to much sense from practical point of view.