OP is responsible for the title even if he pulled it from the article. It's like he's saying it and just regurgitating the bullshit.
OP is responsible for the title even if he pulled it from the article. It's like he's saying it and just regurgitating the bullshit.
That's not how it works, when left untouched haaretz is responsible for the title, if OP modifies it, then it's OP who's responsible
That's not how it works, when left untouched haaretz is responsible for the title, if OP modifies it, then it's OP who's responsible
Also title grabbing helps to deduplicate archive links.
Also title grabbing helps to deduplicate archive links.
No. OP is responsible, he's the one doing the posting. He should change unless he agrees with it. OP agrees with the title.
No. OP is responsible, he's the one doing the posting. He should change unless he agrees with it. OP agrees with the title.
Not according to the law
Not according to the law
(post is archived)