WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

They know they need Whites', Christian's support and they know they are 'losing it' and 'losing it' fast. (they never really had much support they just had Whites fearful of reprisal so nobody spoke out. That's changed heavily over the last 3 months.) They, jews, actually got the allowance, a proverbial permission slip to do so. Call it jewish taqiyya.

They know they need Whites', Christian's support and they know they are 'losing it' and 'losing it' fast. (they never really had much support they just had Whites fearful of reprisal so nobody spoke out. That's changed heavily over the last 3 months.) They, jews, actually got the allowance, a proverbial permission slip to do so. Call it jewish taqiyya.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The jews wouldn't do it themselves; so they made the Romans do it.

[–] 2 pts

Are you trying to claim the jews did not kill Jesus?

[–] 1 pt

The jews literally bullied the governor into killing the Messiah under threat of another revolt. Had Rome made an effort to understand the religion of jews and how it was changing and the new religion of Christianity they would have picked supporting Christianity mostly because of taxes.

The jews wielded Rome against Christ, or maybe its better to say that the crucifixion was roman but the false conviction was jewish.

Rome's general rule was that upstart cults were dangerous and acceptable to purge. Rome was particular paranoid about Christianity because they believed Christians blamed them for the death of their Messiah. To the point they believed a number of fires were acts of Christian terrorism as retribution, much of this was likely political theatre.

[–] 0 pt

No. They made the Roman's do it for them. It's my understanding that they basically pressured Pilate into crucifying him.