Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

They are the same people. Neither are the Israelites. Arabs are Jews. Jews are Arabs. These Arabs are the Canaanites, Babylonians, Edomites, Amalekites, and many others. This is why Jesus calls them, "dogs."

https://archive.ph/iptUz

[–] • 3 pts

Yet the kikes are still throwing around amalek, who they refer to as basically everyone, when they themselves may be amalek

[–] • 2 pts

Most modern-day Jews self -profess to be Ashkenazi, so named because they are descended of Ashkenoz, son of Gomer, son of Noah's son Japeth. The "Children of Israel" with respect to Gods chosen people and the covenant made with Abraham are nowhere in this lineage. Abraham was descended from Noah's first son Shem ("Sem" in Greek, which has no "h", and upon which the word "Semite" is based). You can refer to the first chapter of Mathew or the third chapter of Luke for lineage of Jesus through David back to Shem.

Modern-day Jews are NOT the Biblical Israelites, plain and simple, if you use the Bible as authority. If you really wish to drive that point home to a Christian the point can be made that the Christian faith holds that all content of the Bible exists for a point and purpose. For example, nothing further is said about Noah's middle son Ham. Perhaps Japeth's line IS discussed simply to make it clear that the descents of Ashkenoz are NOT descendants of Abraham. Period.

[–] • 2 pts

Then there's the whole Genesis 3 thing they quote, where we have to bless Israel to be blessed, when that really only pertained to Abraham (in the case of his offspring that'd be both jews and muzzies)

[–] • 1 pt

https://www.wrmea.org/2015-october/the-scofield-bible-the-book-that-made-zionists-of-americas-evangelical-christians.html

>...Being a “born again” preacher did not preclude Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men’s club in 1901, either. In his devastating biography, The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield suggests, “The admission of Scofield to the Lotus Club, which could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion that has cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of C.I. Scofield.” That someone, Canfield suspects, was associated with one of the club’s committee members, the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. As Canfield intimates, Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s pet projects—the Zionist Movement.”...

[–] • 2 pts

Indeed. And the whole dispensationalist movement that preceded that in the 19th century. I was raised that way, but always admired my WWII vet grandpa who sent me books, hated jews, always in time with alternative media... It'd be funny him calling my zio christian dad, complaining about what they were doing behind the scenes, though I didn't realize he was right till later

[–] • 1 pt

>That'd be a hard pill to swallow for the Christian Zionist crowd

No

They would simply pretend it doesn't exist lol

You're starting with the premise that, you're dealing with reasonable people whose ideology is rooted in facts. It's the other way around; they bend reality to suit their narrative, since day 1, it's a dangerous mix of con artists, mostly clueless but useful idiots and very cynical types

[–] • 1 pt

Yep. Still have family/friends in that vein but they know where I stand... I want to find a new church though

[–] • 1 pt

I'd love to see dna "23 and me" results from jews and arabs. Dollars to donuts they have very similar HLA (human leukocyte antigen).

[–] • 1 pt

Blackstone bought Ancestry just so that doesn't happen.