Yes it is. People think the Hall of cost was bad, but this is much worse. It's worse than 9/11 and WuFlu too. This scam enables all the other scams.

I knew a serial embezzler who would try doing similar criminal crap. The problem is that most ponzis and scam eventually run into one of many problems

• The structure unfolds and it becomes harder to hide the scam. Usually this is done when the scammer is so blatantly arrogant it becomes very hard to ignore the scam. At this point, one must either continue the scam by hook or crook, and the US has taken the crook method

• The diversity hires are too stupid to run the scam, and the new jews are incapable of understanding how the old jews were keeping the scam up. Think 1940 with the creation of the SEC after the 1929 crash. The SEC states they returned billions in stolen funds, but really the SEC printed a ton of money and gave legitimacy to the new currency. In return, everyone forgot or ignored the old assholes who crashed the entire fiscal system into the ground. Or think to Rhodesia where niggers are too stupid to understand igniting rocks is not the same thing as igniting coal (this actually happened)

• No amount of jewish kabuki theater will make people override their own natural understanding of the world. jews are very much the people of if you cant dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. It's hard to tell people to commit to a scam, when the underlying entities are so greedy, that the costs of living are doubling or trippling in under a year.

Honest question: Without interest ("usury"), how do you handle the time value of money?

Am I (as an individual or a small bank) allowed to give you $$ today so that you can spend it on something you need now? If so, how am I to be compensated for my delayed spending, if not with more money in return at a later date?

If you don't like that, let me give you an alternative abstraction:

Let's say I have 5 gallons of gas and you need to go someplace today. I -could- go someplace today, but I could also wait and go next week. Yes, I'd like to use the 5 gallons today, but my schedule is flexible. Am I allowed to loan you the 5 gallons of gas? Would it be reasonable for me to expect you to give me 6 gallons of gas back next week given I deferred my travel? (If you are not willing pay me back with extra gas, and if you are not attractive enough to compensate me via means, then I'm not going to loan you the gas today.)

(Fuck the central banks and their dirty pay masters. I'm not defending them. Just challenging you on the basic concept of the time value of money...)