WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

923

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Here's an archive of article https://archive.is/daC1s Article says New Orleans jewish population is extremely low & there is no reason for jew hatred in New Orleans.

I refute that by stating the Port of New Orleans is the 6th biggest port in the US & has been jew ran at least as early as the 1950s when family had real world knowledge of this.

Tulane University is also ranked as the 6th best university for kikes in America. https://archive.is/LfXQT

t. I grew up in the nigger/jew infested city of New Orleans...

[–] 4 pts

It's a classic Jew propaganda piece. Refuses to discuss contents. Lies about contents. Presents Jews as victims. Implies Jews have no power (minority). Wears gloves to imply people presenting are evil and information is dangerous for you. Presents human rights (first amendment) as an act of evil. It's a hit piece only evil can produce.

You can be completely sure this news station is owned and fully controlled by Jews.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

These fucking crybaby people, fucking scared that someone is antisemitic. Imagine if they were to happen to see this website.

Fuck the jews and niggers.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

>Imagine if they were to happen to see this website.

They would screenshot it non stop for a month, compile it in a 15 Gb pdf then run to the gvt and use that as an excuse to lobby for more internet control/censorship and ask grants left and rights to fight antisemitism™

It's a business, for the ADL "crude antisemitic rhetoric" is like crude oil for the oil industry. Where would they be without antisemites? They would be looking for a new job I guess

Now it's a two hedged sword; if all they have to show is compilations of data pointing at the fact that jews are jews... Like here https://pic8.co/sh/W3vkJ2.jpg well... That's not necessarily something they want to point at to begin with.

Where I'm getting at is that, it doesn't have to be insulting/disrespectful or hateful to be efficient, it only needs to be factual. Besides, when it's factual and not even insulting/disrespectful or hateful it can't even be held against whoever is making the statement, which in turn is much more efficient when it comes to sharing/spreading, general awareness

When that sucker will go up in flame don't worry people are going to get pissed and they're going to ask whose fault is this, and it's a good thing if they already noticed a trend.

Trends, I like trends, charts, numbers, percentages, facts

[–] 2 pts

Lawerence Leichtman says he instantly reported the package to the anti-defamation league (ADL)

So scared you didnt call the cops hmmmm....

[–] 1 pt

"filled with rhetoric that's so hateful we won't show it on TV or on the web." So I'm just supposed to take their word for it?