WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/npr-claims-limited-scientific-evidence-men-have-physical-advantage-over-women-in-sports/ -> https://archive.md/laifT

National Public Radio (NPR) claimed that “there is limited scientific research” supporting the idea that biological males have a “physical advantage” over biological females in competitive sports.

They specify "biological" too.

e; Then they flip to "tranny women" (men) and say they're born female, raised female etc. and are female with XY chromosomes. This article (NPR one) is meant to conflate the two of "biological female" and "tranny female" (male) even further. Soon "tranny female" (male) will be the same as "biological female" as the kikes conflate language.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/npr-claims-limited-scientific-evidence-men-have-physical-advantage-over-women-in-sports/ -> https://archive.md/laifT >National Public Radio (NPR) claimed that “there is limited scientific research” supporting the idea that biological males have a “physical advantage” over biological females in competitive sports. They specify "biological" too. e; Then they flip to "tranny women" (men) and say they're born female, raised female etc. and are female with XY chromosomes. This article (NPR one) is meant to conflate the two of "biological female" and "tranny female" (male) even further. Soon "tranny female" (male) will be the same as "biological female" as the kikes conflate language.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

technically it is limited in the sense...

No, that's not technically correct. The limit isn't the # the limit is in that it's proven or not.

We have limited research in this theory ...

Where "..." means "because we have not proven it or found a counter to it." Don't do that - what you're doing - you're wrong.